BMW iX1 vs Škoda Elroq
Biggest differences: Power — BMW iX1 204 PS, Škoda Elroq 286 PS · 0–100 km/h — BMW iX1 8.6 s, Škoda Elroq 6.6 s · WLTP range — BMW iX1 475 km, Škoda Elroq 573 km.
BMW iX1
The BMW iX1 is a compact electric SUV that offers two power options and can be configured with either front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.
Profile against the market: BMW iX1 vs Škoda Elroq
BMW iX1eDrive20
Škoda Elroq85
BMW iX1 or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +98 km
- Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +12.3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +82 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −2 s
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +10 km/h
- DC charging kWŠkoda Elroq +5 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minŠkoda Elroq −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgBMW iX1 −185 kg
- Boot lBMW iX1 +20 l
Technical data: BMW iX1 vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW iX1 eDrive20 | Škoda Elroq 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 475 km | 573 km | Škoda +98 km |
| Battery | 64.7 kWh | 77 kWh | Škoda +12.3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.4 kWh/100 km | 15.2 kWh/100 km | Škoda −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 130 kW | 135 kW | Škoda +5 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 29 min | 28 min | Škoda −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 11.5 km/min | 14.3 km/min | Škoda +2.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 286 PS | Škoda +82 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.6 s | 6.6 s | Škoda −2 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | Škoda +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1865 kg | 2050 kg | BMW −185 kg |
| Boot | 490 l | 470 l | BMW +20 l |
| Length | 4500 mm | 4488 mm | BMW +12 mm |
| Width | 1845 mm | 1884 mm | Škoda +39 mm |
| Height | 1616 mm | 1625 mm | Škoda +9 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2692 mm | 2765 mm | Škoda +73 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX1
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BMW iX1 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 475 km of the BMW iX1. That is a difference of 98 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX1 and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The BMW iX1 has FWD and 204 PS. The Škoda Elroq has RWD and 286 PS.
Which is more powerful — BMW iX1 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq is stronger: 286 PS against the 204 PS of the BMW iX1. The gap is 82 PS.
Which charges faster?
The BMW iX1 accepts up to 130 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 135 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 28 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.