BMW iX1 vs Škoda Elroq

Škoda Elroq leads 6 to 2

Biggest differences: Power — BMW iX1 204 PS, Škoda Elroq 299 PS · 0–100 km/h — BMW iX1 8.6 s, Škoda Elroq 6.2 s · DC charging — BMW iX1 130 kW, Škoda Elroq 165 kW.

BMW iX1

BMW iX1 is a C-segment SUV in two variants: the eDrive20 with a WLTP range of 516 km and the xDrive30 with 306 hp.

Škoda Elroq

The Škoda Elroq is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, available with either RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs ranging from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 576 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.

Profile against the market: BMW iX1 vs Škoda Elroq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX1 or Škoda Elroq — who wins where

Škoda Elroq leads 6 to 2

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +60 km
    BMW iX1
    516
    Škoda Elroq
    576
  • Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +11.8 kWh
    BMW iX1
    65.2
    Škoda Elroq
    77
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX1 −2.9 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX1
    12.6
    Škoda Elroq
    15.5
  • Power PSŠkoda Elroq +95 PS
    BMW iX1
    204
    Škoda Elroq
    299
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −2.4 s
    BMW iX1
    8.6
    Škoda Elroq
    6.2
  • Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +10 km/h
    BMW iX1
    170
    Škoda Elroq
    180
  • DC charging kWŠkoda Elroq +35 kW
    BMW iX1
    130
    Škoda Elroq
    165
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW iX1
    11
    Škoda Elroq
    11
  • Charging ↓ minNo difference
    BMW iX1
    29
    Škoda Elroq
    29
  • Weight ↓ kgNo data
    BMW iX1
    —
    Škoda Elroq
    2132
  • Boot lBMW iX1 +20 l
    BMW iX1
    490
    Škoda Elroq
    470

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX1 vs Škoda Elroq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX1 vs Škoda Elroq
Key parameters BMW iX1
eDrive20 · 2026 model year
Škoda Elroq
85x
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range516 km576 kmŠkoda +60 km
Battery65.2 kWh77 kWhŠkoda +11.8 kWh
Consumption ↓12.6 kWh/100 km15.5 kWh/100 kmBMW −2.9 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging130 kW165 kWŠkoda +35 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓29 min29 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging12.5 km/min13.9 km/minŠkoda +1.4 km/min
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS299 PSŠkoda +95 PS
0–100 km/h ↓8.6 s6.2 sŠkoda −2.4 s
Top speed170 km/h180 km/hŠkoda +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓—2132 kg—
Boot490 l470 lBMW +20 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Škoda
Length—4488 mm—
Width—1884 mm—
Height—1620 mm—
Wheelbase—2766 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX1

Cost per 100 km3.78
Monthly47
Yearly567

Škoda Elroq

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX1

Škoda Elroq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX1 or Škoda Elroq?

The Škoda Elroq goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 516 km of the BMW iX1. That is a difference of 60 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX1 and the Škoda Elroq differ?

The BMW iX1 has FWD and 204 PS. The Škoda Elroq has AWD and 299 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Škoda Elroq — its 77 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX1, with 65.2 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — BMW iX1 or Škoda Elroq?

The Škoda Elroq is stronger: 299 PS against the 204 PS of the BMW iX1. The gap is 95 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.