BMW iX1 vs Lancia Gamma

Lancia Gamma leads 7 to 2

Biggest differences: AC charging — BMW iX1 11 kW, Lancia Gamma 7 kW · Battery — BMW iX1 65.2 kWh, Lancia Gamma 97.2 kWh · WLTP range — BMW iX1 516 km, Lancia Gamma 741 km.

BMW iX1

BMW iX1 is a C-segment SUV in two variants: the eDrive20 with a WLTP range of 516 km and the xDrive30 with 306 hp.

Lancia Gamma

The Lancia Gamma is an all-electric crossover in the C segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 543 to 741 km, power ranging from 230 to 350 horsepower, and DC fast charging at 160 kW.

Profile against the market: BMW iX1 vs Lancia Gamma

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX1 or Lancia Gamma — who wins where

Lancia Gamma leads 7 to 2

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLancia Gamma +225 km
    BMW iX1
    516
    Lancia Gamma
    741
  • Battery kWhLancia Gamma +32 kWh
    BMW iX1
    65.2
    Lancia Gamma
    97.2
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX1 −3.6 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX1
    12.6
    Lancia Gamma
    16.2
  • Power PSLancia Gamma +41 PS
    BMW iX1
    204
    Lancia Gamma
    245
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sLancia Gamma −0.8 s
    BMW iX1
    8.6
    Lancia Gamma
    7.8
  • Top speed km/hLancia Gamma +20 km/h
    BMW iX1
    170
    Lancia Gamma
    190
  • DC charging kWLancia Gamma +30 kW
    BMW iX1
    130
    Lancia Gamma
    160
  • AC charging kWBMW iX1 +4 kW
    BMW iX1
    11
    Lancia Gamma
    7
  • Weight ↓ kgNo data
    BMW iX1
    —
    Lancia Gamma
    2135
  • Boot lLancia Gamma +70 l
    BMW iX1
    490
    Lancia Gamma
    560

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX1 vs Lancia Gamma

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX1 vs Lancia Gamma
Key parameters BMW iX1
eDrive20 · 2026 model year
Lancia Gamma
Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range516 km741 kmLancia +225 km
Battery65.2 kWh97.2 kWhLancia +32 kWh
Consumption ↓12.6 kWh/100 km16.2 kWh/100 kmBMW −3.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging130 kW160 kWLancia +30 kW
AC charging11 kW7 kWBMW +4 kW
Charging ⚠29 min 10–80%27 min 20–80%2 min
Range per minute of charging12.5 km/min16.5 km/minLancia +4 km/min
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS245 PSLancia +41 PS
0–100 km/h ↓8.6 s7.8 sLancia −0.8 s
Top speed170 km/h190 km/hLancia +20 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓—2135 kg—
Boot490 l560 lLancia +70 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Lancia
Length—4672 mm—
Width—1898 mm—
Height—1664 mm—
Wheelbase—2791 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX1

Cost per 100 km3.78
Monthly47
Yearly567

Lancia Gamma

Cost per 100 km4.86
Monthly61
Yearly729

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX1

Lancia Gamma

Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX1 or Lancia Gamma?

The Lancia Gamma goes further: 741 km WLTP against the 516 km of the BMW iX1. That is a difference of 225 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Lancia Gamma — its 97.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX1, with 65.2 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Lancia Gamma takes more: 560 l against 490 l in the BMW iX1. The difference is 70 l.

Which charges faster?

The BMW iX1 accepts up to 130 kW DC, the Lancia Gamma up to 160 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.