Kia Niro EV vs Smart #3

Biggest differences: AC charging — Kia Niro EV 11 kW, Smart #3 22 kW · DC charging — Kia Niro EV 80 kW, Smart #3 150 kW · Charging 10–80% — Kia Niro EV 43 min, Smart #3 30 min.

Kia Niro EV

The Kia Niro EV is an electric crossover in the C-segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 460 km according to the WLTP cycle.

Smart #3

The Smart #3 is an electric SUV in the C segment, offering three different drive configurations and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: Kia Niro EV vs Smart #3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Kia Niro EV or Smart #3 — who wins where

Smart #3 leads 8 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmKia Niro EV +5 km
    Kia Niro EV
    460
    Smart #3
    455
  • Battery kWhSmart #3 +1.2 kWh
    Kia Niro EV
    64.8
    Smart #3
    66
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmSmart #3 −0.2 kWh/100 km
    Kia Niro EV
    16.2
    Smart #3
    16
  • Power PSSmart #3 +68 PS
    Kia Niro EV
    204
    Smart #3
    272
  • 0–100 km/h sSmart #3 −2 s
    Kia Niro EV
    7.8
    Smart #3
    5.8
  • Top speed km/hSmart #3 +13 km/h
    Kia Niro EV
    167
    Smart #3
    180
  • DC charging kWSmart #3 +70 kW
    Kia Niro EV
    80
    Smart #3
    150
  • AC charging kWSmart #3 +11 kW
    Kia Niro EV
    11
    Smart #3
    22
  • Charging minSmart #3 −13 min
    Kia Niro EV
    43
    Smart #3
    30
  • Weight kgKia Niro EV −170 kg
    Kia Niro EV
    1610
    Smart #3
    1780
  • Boot lKia Niro EV +105 l
    Kia Niro EV
    475
    Smart #3
    370

Add a third car

Technical data: Kia Niro EV vs Smart #3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Kia Niro EV vs Smart #3
Key parameters Kia Niro EV
64.8 kWh
Smart #3
Pro+
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range460 km455 kmKia +5 km
Battery64.8 kWh66 kWhSmart +1.2 kWh
Consumption16.2 kWh/100 km16 kWh/100 kmSmart −0.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging80 kW150 kWSmart +70 kW
AC charging11 kW22 kWSmart +11 kW
Charging 10–80%43 min30 minSmart −13 min
Range per minute of charging7.5 km/min10.6 km/minSmart +3.1 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS272 PSSmart +68 PS
0–100 km/h7.8 s5.8 sSmart −2 s
Top speed167 km/h180 km/hSmart +13 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1610 kg1780 kgKia −170 kg
Boot475 l370 lKia +105 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4420 mm4400 mmKia +20 mm
Width1825 mm1844 mmSmart +19 mm
Height1570 mm1556 mmKia +14 mm
Wheelbase2720 mm2785 mmSmart +65 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Kia Niro EV

Cost per 100 km4.86
Monthly61
Yearly729

Smart #3

Cost per 100 km4.8
Monthly60
Yearly720

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Kia Niro EV

Smart #3

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Why does the Smart #3 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Kia Niro EV?

The Smart #3 carries 66 kWh and covers 455 km, while the Kia Niro EV with its 64.8 kWh battery does 460 km. Energy use decides it: 16 against 16.2 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Kia Niro EV and the Smart #3 differ?

The Kia Niro EV has FWD and 204 PS. The Smart #3 has RWD and 272 PS.

Which is more powerful — Kia Niro EV or Smart #3?

The Smart #3 is stronger: 272 PS against the 204 PS of the Kia Niro EV. The gap is 68 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Kia Niro EV takes more: 475 l against 370 l in the Smart #3. The difference is 105 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.