Lancia Gamma vs Smart #3

It's a tie: 5 to 5

Biggest differences: AC charging — Lancia Gamma 7 kW, Smart #3 22 kW · WLTP range — Lancia Gamma 741 km, Smart #3 455 km · Boot — Lancia Gamma 560 l, Smart #3 370 l.

Lancia Gamma

The Lancia Gamma is an all-electric crossover in the C segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 543 to 741 km, power ranging from 230 to 350 horsepower, and DC fast charging at 160 kW.

Smart #3

The Smart #3 is an electric SUV in the C segment, offering three different drive configurations and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: Lancia Gamma vs Smart #3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Lancia Gamma or Smart #3 — who wins where

It's a tie: 5 to 5

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLancia Gamma +286 km
    Lancia Gamma
    741
    Smart #3
    455
  • Battery kWhLancia Gamma +31.2 kWh
    Lancia Gamma
    97.2
    Smart #3
    66
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmSmart #3 −0.2 kWh/100 km
    Lancia Gamma
    16.2
    Smart #3
    16
  • Power PSSmart #3 +27 PS
    Lancia Gamma
    245
    Smart #3
    272
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sSmart #3 −2 s
    Lancia Gamma
    7.8
    Smart #3
    5.8
  • Top speed km/hLancia Gamma +10 km/h
    Lancia Gamma
    190
    Smart #3
    180
  • DC charging kWLancia Gamma +10 kW
    Lancia Gamma
    160
    Smart #3
    150
  • AC charging kWSmart #3 +15 kW
    Lancia Gamma
    7
    Smart #3
    22
  • Weight ↓ kgSmart #3 −355 kg
    Lancia Gamma
    2135
    Smart #3
    1780
  • Boot lLancia Gamma +190 l
    Lancia Gamma
    560
    Smart #3
    370

Add a third car

Technical data: Lancia Gamma vs Smart #3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Lancia Gamma vs Smart #3
Key parameters Lancia Gamma
Long Range
Smart #3
Pro+
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range741 km455 kmLancia +286 km
Battery97.2 kWh66 kWhLancia +31.2 kWh
Consumption ↓16.2 kWh/100 km16 kWh/100 kmSmart −0.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging160 kW150 kWLancia +10 kW
AC charging7 kW22 kWSmart +15 kW
Charging ⚠27 min 20–80%30 min 10–80%3 min
Range per minute of charging16.5 km/min10.6 km/minLancia +5.9 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power245 PS272 PSSmart +27 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7.8 s5.8 sSmart −2 s
Top speed190 km/h180 km/hLancia +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2135 kg1780 kgSmart −355 kg
Boot560 l370 lLancia +190 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4672 mm4400 mmLancia +272 mm
Width1898 mm1844 mmLancia +54 mm
Height1664 mm1556 mmLancia +108 mm
Wheelbase2791 mm2785 mmLancia +6 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Lancia Gamma

Cost per 100 km4.86
Monthly61
Yearly729

Smart #3

Cost per 100 km4.8
Monthly60
Yearly720

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Lancia Gamma

Smart #3

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Lancia Gamma or Smart #3?

The Lancia Gamma goes further: 741 km WLTP against the 455 km of the Smart #3. That is a difference of 286 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Lancia Gamma and the Smart #3 differ?

The Lancia Gamma has FWD and 245 PS. The Smart #3 has RWD and 272 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Lancia Gamma takes more: 560 l against 370 l in the Smart #3. The difference is 190 l.

Which charges faster?

The Lancia Gamma accepts up to 160 kW DC, the Smart #3 up to 150 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.