Škoda Elroq vs Smart #3

Biggest differences: AC charging — Škoda Elroq 11 kW, Smart #3 22 kW · Boot — Škoda Elroq 470 l, Smart #3 370 l · WLTP range — Škoda Elroq 573 km, Smart #3 455 km.

Škoda Elroq

The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.

Smart #3

The Smart #3 is an electric SUV in the C segment, offering three different drive configurations and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: Škoda Elroq vs Smart #3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Škoda Elroq or Smart #3 — who wins where

Škoda Elroq leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +118 km
    Škoda Elroq
    573
    Smart #3
    455
  • Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +11 kWh
    Škoda Elroq
    77
    Smart #3
    66
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −0.8 kWh/100 km
    Škoda Elroq
    15.2
    Smart #3
    16
  • Power PSŠkoda Elroq +14 PS
    Škoda Elroq
    286
    Smart #3
    272
  • 0–100 km/h sSmart #3 −0.8 s
    Škoda Elroq
    6.6
    Smart #3
    5.8
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Škoda Elroq
    180
    Smart #3
    180
  • DC charging kWSmart #3 +15 kW
    Škoda Elroq
    135
    Smart #3
    150
  • AC charging kWSmart #3 +11 kW
    Škoda Elroq
    11
    Smart #3
    22
  • Charging minŠkoda Elroq −2 min
    Škoda Elroq
    28
    Smart #3
    30
  • Weight kgSmart #3 −270 kg
    Škoda Elroq
    2050
    Smart #3
    1780
  • Boot lŠkoda Elroq +100 l
    Škoda Elroq
    470
    Smart #3
    370

Add a third car

Technical data: Škoda Elroq vs Smart #3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Škoda Elroq vs Smart #3
Key parameters Škoda Elroq
85
Smart #3
Pro+
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range573 km455 kmŠkoda +118 km
Battery77 kWh66 kWhŠkoda +11 kWh
Consumption15.2 kWh/100 km16 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −0.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging135 kW150 kWSmart +15 kW
AC charging11 kW22 kWSmart +11 kW
Charging 10–80%28 min30 minŠkoda −2 min
Range per minute of charging14.3 km/min10.6 km/minŠkoda +3.7 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power286 PS272 PSŠkoda +14 PS
0–100 km/h6.6 s5.8 sSmart −0.8 s
Top speed180 km/h180 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2050 kg1780 kgSmart −270 kg
Boot470 l370 lŠkoda +100 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Smart
Length4488 mm4400 mmŠkoda +88 mm
Width1884 mm1844 mmŠkoda +40 mm
Height1625 mm1556 mmŠkoda +69 mm
Wheelbase2765 mm2785 mmSmart +20 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Škoda Elroq

Cost per 100 km4.56
Monthly57
Yearly684

Smart #3

Cost per 100 km4.8
Monthly60
Yearly720

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Škoda Elroq

Smart #3

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Škoda Elroq or Smart #3?

The Škoda Elroq goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 455 km of the Smart #3. That is a difference of 118 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Smart #3 — its 66 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Elroq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Škoda Elroq takes more: 470 l against 370 l in the Smart #3. The difference is 100 l.

Which charges faster?

The Škoda Elroq accepts up to 135 kW DC, the Smart #3 up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 30 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.