Kia Niro EV vs Lancia Gamma

Lancia Gamma leads 6 to 2

Biggest differences: DC charging — Kia Niro EV 80 kW, Lancia Gamma 160 kW · WLTP range — Kia Niro EV 460 km, Lancia Gamma 741 km · AC charging — Kia Niro EV 11 kW, Lancia Gamma 7 kW.

Kia Niro EV

The Kia Niro EV is an electric crossover in the C-segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 460 km according to the WLTP cycle.

Lancia Gamma

The Lancia Gamma is an all-electric crossover in the C segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 543 to 741 km, power ranging from 230 to 350 horsepower, and DC fast charging at 160 kW.

Profile against the market: Kia Niro EV vs Lancia Gamma

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Kia Niro EV or Lancia Gamma — who wins where

Lancia Gamma leads 6 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLancia Gamma +281 km
    Kia Niro EV
    460
    Lancia Gamma
    741
  • Battery kWhLancia Gamma +32.4 kWh
    Kia Niro EV
    64.8
    Lancia Gamma
    97.2
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNo difference
    Kia Niro EV
    16.2
    Lancia Gamma
    16.2
  • Power PSLancia Gamma +41 PS
    Kia Niro EV
    204
    Lancia Gamma
    245
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo difference
    Kia Niro EV
    7.8
    Lancia Gamma
    7.8
  • Top speed km/hLancia Gamma +23 km/h
    Kia Niro EV
    167
    Lancia Gamma
    190
  • DC charging kWLancia Gamma +80 kW
    Kia Niro EV
    80
    Lancia Gamma
    160
  • AC charging kWKia Niro EV +4 kW
    Kia Niro EV
    11
    Lancia Gamma
    7
  • Weight ↓ kgKia Niro EV −525 kg
    Kia Niro EV
    1610
    Lancia Gamma
    2135
  • Boot lLancia Gamma +85 l
    Kia Niro EV
    475
    Lancia Gamma
    560

Add a third car

Technical data: Kia Niro EV vs Lancia Gamma

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Kia Niro EV vs Lancia Gamma
Key parameters Kia Niro EV
64.8 kWh
Lancia Gamma
Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range460 km741 kmLancia +281 km
Battery64.8 kWh97.2 kWhLancia +32.4 kWh
Consumption ↓16.2 kWh/100 km16.2 kWh/100 kmNo difference
Charging
DC charging80 kW160 kWLancia +80 kW
AC charging11 kW7 kWKia +4 kW
Charging ⚠43 min 10–80%27 min 20–80%16 min
Range per minute of charging7.5 km/min16.5 km/minLancia +9 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS245 PSLancia +41 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7.8 s7.8 sNo difference
Top speed167 km/h190 km/hLancia +23 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓1610 kg2135 kgKia −525 kg
Boot475 l560 lLancia +85 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4420 mm4672 mmLancia +252 mm
Width1825 mm1898 mmLancia +73 mm
Height1570 mm1664 mmLancia +94 mm
Wheelbase2720 mm2791 mmLancia +71 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Kia Niro EV

Cost per 100 km4.86
Monthly61
Yearly729

Lancia Gamma

Cost per 100 km4.86
Monthly61
Yearly729

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Kia Niro EV

Lancia Gamma

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Kia Niro EV or Lancia Gamma?

The Lancia Gamma goes further: 741 km WLTP against the 460 km of the Kia Niro EV. That is a difference of 281 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Lancia Gamma takes more: 560 l against 475 l in the Kia Niro EV. The difference is 85 l.

Which charges faster?

The Kia Niro EV accepts up to 80 kW DC, the Lancia Gamma up to 160 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.