Peugeot E-3008 vs Škoda Elroq
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Peugeot E-3008 8.7 s, Škoda Elroq 6.6 s · Battery — Peugeot E-3008 96.9 kWh, Škoda Elroq 77 kWh · Boot — Peugeot E-3008 588 l, Škoda Elroq 470 l.
Peugeot E-3008
The Peugeot E-3008 is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Peugeot E-3008 vs Škoda Elroq
Peugeot E-3008230 Long Range
Škoda Elroq85
Peugeot E-3008 or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot E-3008 +125 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot E-3008 +19.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −1.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +55 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −2.1 s
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +10 km/h
- DC charging kWPeugeot E-3008 +25 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Elroq −116 kg
- Boot lPeugeot E-3008 +118 l
Technical data: Peugeot E-3008 vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Peugeot E-3008 230 Long Range | Škoda Elroq 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 698 km | 573 km | Peugeot +125 km |
| Battery | 96.9 kWh | 77 kWh | Peugeot +19.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.1 kWh/100 km | 15.2 kWh/100 km | Škoda −1.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 135 kW | Peugeot +25 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 15.5 km/min | 14.3 km/min | Peugeot +1.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 231 PS | 286 PS | Škoda +55 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.7 s | 6.6 s | Škoda −2.1 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | Škoda +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2166 kg | 2050 kg | Škoda −116 kg |
| Boot | 588 l | 470 l | Peugeot +118 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Peugeot |
| Length | 4542 mm | 4488 mm | Peugeot +54 mm |
| Width | 1895 mm | 1884 mm | Peugeot +11 mm |
| Height | 1641 mm | 1625 mm | Peugeot +16 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2739 mm | 2765 mm | Škoda +26 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Peugeot E-3008
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Peugeot E-3008
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Peugeot E-3008 or Škoda Elroq?
The Peugeot E-3008 goes further: 698 km WLTP against the 573 km of the Škoda Elroq. That is a difference of 125 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Peugeot E-3008 and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The Peugeot E-3008 has FWD and 231 PS. The Škoda Elroq has RWD and 286 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Peugeot E-3008 — its 96.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Elroq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Peugeot E-3008 takes more: 588 l against 470 l in the Škoda Elroq. The difference is 118 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.