Renault Scenic vs Škoda Elroq
Škoda Elroq leads 5 to 4
Biggest differences: Power — Renault Scenic 218 PS, Škoda Elroq 299 PS · 0–100 km/h — Renault Scenic 7.9 s, Škoda Elroq 6.2 s · Boot — Renault Scenic 545 l, Škoda Elroq 470 l.
Renault Scenic
An electric SUV in the C segment, offering two battery options with a range of up to 642 km according to the WLTP standard.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, available with either RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs ranging from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 576 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Profile against the market: Renault Scenic vs Škoda Elroq
Renault ScenicLong Range 89 kWh
Škoda Elroq85x
Renault Scenic or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmRenault Scenic +66 km
- Battery kWhRenault Scenic +12 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −1.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +81 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −1.7 s
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +10 km/h
- DC charging kWŠkoda Elroq +15 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Scenic −221 kg
- Boot lRenault Scenic +75 l
Technical data: Renault Scenic vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Renault Scenic Long Range 89 kWh | Škoda Elroq 85x | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 642 km | 576 km | Renault +66 km |
| Battery | 89 kWh | 77 kWh | Renault +12 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.8 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km | Škoda −1.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 165 kW | Škoda +15 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 28 min 15–80% | 29 min 10–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.9 km/min | 13.9 km/min | Renault +1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 299 PS | Škoda +81 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 6.2 s | Škoda −1.7 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | Škoda +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1911 kg | 2132 kg | Renault −221 kg |
| Boot | 545 l | 470 l | Renault +75 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4470 mm | 4488 mm | Škoda +18 mm |
| Width | 1864 mm | 1884 mm | Škoda +20 mm |
| Height | 1571 mm | 1620 mm | Škoda +49 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2785 mm | 2766 mm | Renault +19 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Renault Scenic
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Renault Scenic
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Renault Scenic or Škoda Elroq?
The Renault Scenic goes further: 642 km WLTP against the 576 km of the Škoda Elroq. That is a difference of 66 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Renault Scenic and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The Renault Scenic has FWD and 218 PS. The Škoda Elroq has AWD and 299 PS.
Which is more powerful — Renault Scenic or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq is stronger: 299 PS against the 218 PS of the Renault Scenic. The gap is 81 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Renault Scenic takes more: 545 l against 470 l in the Škoda Elroq. The difference is 75 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.