Renault Scenic vs Škoda Elroq
Biggest differences: Power — Renault Scenic 220 PS, Škoda Elroq 286 PS · 0–100 km/h — Renault Scenic 7.9 s, Škoda Elroq 6.6 s · Boot — Renault Scenic 545 l, Škoda Elroq 470 l.
Renault Scenic
The electric SUV in the C-segment offers two drive variants with different battery capacities and motor power.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Renault Scenic vs Škoda Elroq
Renault ScenicLong Range 87 kWh
Škoda Elroq85
Renault Scenic or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Renault Scenic leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmRenault Scenic +51 km
- Battery kWhRenault Scenic +10 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −1.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +66 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −1.3 s
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +10 km/h
- DC charging kWRenault Scenic +15 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Scenic −197 kg
- Boot lRenault Scenic +75 l
Technical data: Renault Scenic vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Renault ScenicLong Range 87 kWh | Škoda Elroq85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 624 km | 573 km | Renault +51 km |
| Battery | 87 kWh | 77 kWh | Renault +10 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.9 kWh/100 km | 15.2 kWh/100 km | Škoda −1.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 135 kW | Renault +15 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 37 min 15–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 9 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 11 km/min | 14.3 km/min | Škoda +3.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 220 PS | 286 PS | Škoda +66 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 6.6 s | Škoda −1.3 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | Škoda +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1853 kg | 2050 kg | Renault −197 kg |
| Boot | 545 l | 470 l | Renault +75 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Renault |
| Length | 4470 mm | 4488 mm | Škoda +18 mm |
| Width | 1864 mm | 1884 mm | Škoda +20 mm |
| Height | 1571 mm | 1625 mm | Škoda +54 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2785 mm | 2765 mm | Renault +20 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Renault Scenic
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Renault Scenic
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Renault Scenic or Škoda Elroq?
The Renault Scenic goes further: 624 km WLTP against the 573 km of the Škoda Elroq. That is a difference of 51 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Renault Scenic and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The Renault Scenic has FWD and 220 PS. The Škoda Elroq has RWD and 286 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Renault Scenic — its 87 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Elroq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Renault Scenic takes more: 545 l against 470 l in the Škoda Elroq. The difference is 75 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.





