Renault Scenic vs Škoda Elroq

Biggest differences: Power — Renault Scenic 220 PS, Škoda Elroq 286 PS · 0–100 km/h — Renault Scenic 7.9 s, Škoda Elroq 6.6 s · Boot — Renault Scenic 545 l, Škoda Elroq 470 l.

Renault Scenic

The electric SUV in the C-segment offers two drive variants with different battery capacities and motor power.

Škoda Elroq

The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Renault Scenic vs Škoda Elroq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Renault Scenic or Škoda Elroq — who wins where

Renault Scenic leads 5 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmRenault Scenic +51 km
    Renault Scenic
    624
    Škoda Elroq
    573
  • Battery kWhRenault Scenic +10 kWh
    Renault Scenic
    87
    Škoda Elroq
    77
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −1.7 kWh/100 km
    Renault Scenic
    16.9
    Škoda Elroq
    15.2
  • Power PSŠkoda Elroq +66 PS
    Renault Scenic
    220
    Škoda Elroq
    286
  • 0–100 km/h sŠkoda Elroq −1.3 s
    Renault Scenic
    7.9
    Škoda Elroq
    6.6
  • Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +10 km/h
    Renault Scenic
    170
    Škoda Elroq
    180
  • DC charging kWRenault Scenic +15 kW
    Renault Scenic
    150
    Škoda Elroq
    135
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Renault Scenic
    11
    Škoda Elroq
    11
  • Weight kgRenault Scenic −197 kg
    Renault Scenic
    1853
    Škoda Elroq
    2050
  • Boot lRenault Scenic +75 l
    Renault Scenic
    545
    Škoda Elroq
    470

Add a third car

Technical data: Renault Scenic vs Škoda Elroq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Renault Scenic vs Škoda Elroq
Key parameters Renault Scenic
Long Range 87 kWh
Škoda Elroq
85
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range624 km573 kmRenault +51 km
Battery87 kWh77 kWhRenault +10 kWh
Consumption16.9 kWh/100 km15.2 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −1.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW135 kWRenault +15 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 37 min 15–80%28 min 10–80%9 min
Range per minute of charging11 km/min14.3 km/minŠkoda +3.3 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power220 PS286 PSŠkoda +66 PS
0–100 km/h7.9 s6.6 sŠkoda −1.3 s
Top speed170 km/h180 km/hŠkoda +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1853 kg2050 kgRenault −197 kg
Boot545 l470 lRenault +75 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Renault
Length4470 mm4488 mmŠkoda +18 mm
Width1864 mm1884 mmŠkoda +20 mm
Height1571 mm1625 mmŠkoda +54 mm
Wheelbase2785 mm2765 mmRenault +20 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Renault Scenic

Cost per 100 km5.07
Monthly63
Yearly760

Škoda Elroq

Cost per 100 km4.56
Monthly57
Yearly684

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Renault Scenic

Škoda Elroq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Renault Scenic or Škoda Elroq?

The Renault Scenic goes further: 624 km WLTP against the 573 km of the Škoda Elroq. That is a difference of 51 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Renault Scenic and the Škoda Elroq differ?

The Renault Scenic has FWD and 220 PS. The Škoda Elroq has RWD and 286 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Renault Scenic — its 87 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Elroq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Renault Scenic takes more: 545 l against 470 l in the Škoda Elroq. The difference is 75 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.