Jeep Compass vs Renault Scenic
Jeep Compass leads 6 to 3
Biggest differences: Weight — Jeep Compass 2160 kg, Renault Scenic 1911 kg · Battery — Jeep Compass 96.3 kWh, Renault Scenic 89 kWh · DC charging — Jeep Compass 160 kW, Renault Scenic 150 kW.
Jeep Compass
The Jeep Compass is a C-segment SUV in three electric variants: WLTP range from 500 to 674 km, power from 213 to 375 hp.
Renault Scenic
An electric SUV in the C segment, offering two battery options with a range of up to 642 km according to the WLTP standard.
Profile against the market: Jeep Compass vs Renault Scenic
Jeep CompassLong Range FWD (96,3 kWh)
Renault ScenicLong Range 89 kWh
Jeep Compass or Renault Scenic — who wins where
Jeep Compass leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmJeep Compass +32 km
- Battery kWhJeep Compass +7.3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmRenault Scenic −1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSJeep Compass +13 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sRenault Scenic −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hJeep Compass +10 km/h
- DC charging kWJeep Compass +10 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Scenic −249 kg
- Boot lJeep Compass +5 l
Technical data: Jeep Compass vs Renault Scenic
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Jeep Compass Long Range FWD (96,3 kWh) | Renault Scenic Long Range 89 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 674 km | 642 km | Jeep +32 km |
| Battery | 96.3 kWh | 89 kWh | Jeep +7.3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.8 kWh/100 km | 16.8 kWh/100 km | Renault −1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 150 kW | Jeep +10 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 28 min 15–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 15 km/min | 14.9 km/min | Jeep +0.1 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 231 PS | 218 PS | Jeep +13 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.3 s | 7.9 s | Renault −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h | Jeep +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2160 kg | 1911 kg | Renault −249 kg |
| Boot | 550 l | 545 l | Jeep +5 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Renault |
| Length | 4548 mm | 4470 mm | Jeep +78 mm |
| Width | 1936 mm | 1864 mm | Jeep +72 mm |
| Height | 1657 mm | 1571 mm | Jeep +86 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2795 mm | 2785 mm | Jeep +10 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Jeep Compass
Renault Scenic
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Jeep Compass
Renault Scenic
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Jeep Compass or Renault Scenic?
The Jeep Compass goes further: 674 km WLTP against the 642 km of the Renault Scenic. That is a difference of 32 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Renault Scenic — its 89 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Jeep Compass, with 96.3 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Jeep Compass accepts up to 160 kW DC, the Renault Scenic up to 150 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Renault Scenic uses less electricity: 16.8 kWh/100 km against 17.8 kWh/100 km in the Jeep Compass. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 150 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.