Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Toyota C-HR+
Biggest differences: AC charging — Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22 kW, Toyota C-HR+ 11 kW · Boot — Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 545 l, Toyota C-HR+ 416 l · Consumption — Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 16.7 kWh/100 km, Toyota C-HR+ 13.4 kWh/100 km.
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Long Range is a compact SUV with front-wheel drive and a long driving range according to the WLTP standard.
Toyota C-HR+
The Toyota C-HR+ is a crossover in the C segment that offers three different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges, with a top speed of up to 180 km/h.
Profile against the market: Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Toyota C-HR+
Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossLong Range 87 kWh FWD
Toyota C-HR+77 kWh
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross or Toyota C-HR+ — who wins where
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmToyota C-HR+ +6 km
- Battery kWhMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +15 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmToyota C-HR+ −3.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSToyota C-HR+ +6 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sToyota C-HR+ −1 s
- Top speed km/hMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +10 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minToyota C-HR+ −4 min
- Weight ↓ kgMitsubishi Eclipse Cross −48 kg
- Boot lMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +129 l
Technical data: Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Toyota C-HR+
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Long Range 87 kWh FWD | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 600 km | 606 km | Toyota +6 km |
| Battery | 87 kWh | 72 kWh | Mitsubishi +15 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.7 kWh/100 km | 13.4 kWh/100 km | Toyota −3.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 150 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 22 kW | 11 kW | Mitsubishi +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 32 min | 28 min | Toyota −4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 13.1 km/min | 15.2 km/min | Toyota +2.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 224 PS | Toyota +6 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.4 s | 7.4 s | Toyota −1 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 160 km/h | Mitsubishi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1842 kg | 1890 kg | Mitsubishi −48 kg |
| Boot | 545 l | 416 l | Mitsubishi +129 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4470 mm | 4520 mm | Toyota +50 mm |
| Width | 1864 mm | 1870 mm | Toyota +6 mm |
| Height | 1571 mm | 1595 mm | Toyota +24 mm |
| Wheelbase | — | 2750 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Toyota C-HR+
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Toyota C-HR+
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Toyota C-HR+?
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross carries 87 kWh and covers 600 km, while the Toyota C-HR+ with its 72 kWh battery does 606 km. Energy use decides it: 16.7 against 13.4 kWh/100 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross takes more: 545 l against 416 l in the Toyota C-HR+. The difference is 129 l.
Which charges faster?
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Toyota C-HR+ up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 32 and 28 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Toyota C-HR+ uses less electricity: 13.4 kWh/100 km against 16.7 kWh/100 km in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 495 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.