Kia EV3 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Biggest differences: AC charging — Kia EV3 11 kW, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22 kW · Boot — Kia EV3 460 l, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 545 l · DC charging — Kia EV3 128 kW, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 150 kW.
Kia EV3
The Kia EV3 is an all-electric compact SUV, offering four different powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Long Range is a compact SUV with front-wheel drive and a long driving range according to the WLTP standard.
Profile against the market: Kia EV3 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Kia EV381.4 kWh FWD
Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossLong Range 87 kWh FWD
Kia EV3 or Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross — who wins where
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmKia EV3 +5 km
- Battery kWhMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +5.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmKia EV3 −1.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +14 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sKia EV3 −0.7 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +22 kW
- AC charging kWMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minKia EV3 −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgKia EV3 −32 kg
- Boot lMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +85 l
Technical data: Kia EV3 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Kia EV3 81.4 kWh FWD | Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Long Range 87 kWh FWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 605 km | 600 km | Kia +5 km |
| Battery | 81.4 kWh | 87 kWh | Mitsubishi +5.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.9 kWh/100 km | 16.7 kWh/100 km | Kia −1.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 128 kW | 150 kW | Mitsubishi +22 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Mitsubishi +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 31 min | 32 min | Kia −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 13.7 km/min | 13.1 km/min | Kia +0.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 218 PS | Mitsubishi +14 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.7 s | 8.4 s | Kia −0.7 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 170 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1810 kg | 1842 kg | Kia −32 kg |
| Boot | 460 l | 545 l | Mitsubishi +85 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4300 mm | 4470 mm | Mitsubishi +170 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm | 1864 mm | Mitsubishi +14 mm |
| Height | 1560 mm | 1571 mm | Mitsubishi +11 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2680 mm | — | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Kia EV3
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Kia EV3
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Kia EV3?
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross carries 87 kWh and covers 600 km, while the Kia EV3 with its 81.4 kWh battery does 605 km. Energy use decides it: 16.7 against 14.9 kWh/100 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross takes more: 545 l against 460 l in the Kia EV3. The difference is 85 l.
Which charges faster?
The Kia EV3 accepts up to 128 kW DC, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 31 and 32 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Kia EV3 uses less electricity: 14.9 kWh/100 km against 16.7 kWh/100 km in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 270 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.