Lancia Gamma vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Lancia Gamma leads 8 to 2
Biggest differences: AC charging — Lancia Gamma 7 kW, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 22 kW · WLTP range — Lancia Gamma 741 km, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 600 km · Weight — Lancia Gamma 2135 kg, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 1842 kg.
Lancia Gamma
The Lancia Gamma is an all-electric crossover in the C segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 543 to 741 km, power ranging from 230 to 350 horsepower, and DC fast charging at 160 kW.
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Long Range is a compact SUV with front-wheel drive and a long driving range according to the WLTP standard.
Profile against the market: Lancia Gamma vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Lancia GammaLong Range
Mitsubishi Eclipse CrossLong Range 87 kWh FWD
Lancia Gamma or Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross — who wins where
Lancia Gamma leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLancia Gamma +141 km
- Battery kWhLancia Gamma +10.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLancia Gamma −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLancia Gamma +27 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sLancia Gamma −0.6 s
- Top speed km/hLancia Gamma +20 km/h
- DC charging kWLancia Gamma +10 kW
- AC charging kWMitsubishi Eclipse Cross +15 kW
- Weight ↓ kgMitsubishi Eclipse Cross −293 kg
- Boot lLancia Gamma +15 l
Technical data: Lancia Gamma vs Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Lancia Gamma Long Range | Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Long Range 87 kWh FWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 741 km | 600 km | Lancia +141 km |
| Battery | 97.2 kWh | 87 kWh | Lancia +10.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.2 kWh/100 km | 16.7 kWh/100 km | Lancia −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 150 kW | Lancia +10 kW |
| AC charging | 7 kW | 22 kW | Mitsubishi +15 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 32 min 10–80% | 5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 16.5 km/min | 13.1 km/min | Lancia +3.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 245 PS | 218 PS | Lancia +27 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.8 s | 8.4 s | Lancia −0.6 s |
| Top speed | 190 km/h | 170 km/h | Lancia +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2135 kg | 1842 kg | Mitsubishi −293 kg |
| Boot | 560 l | 545 l | Lancia +15 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4672 mm | 4470 mm | Lancia +202 mm |
| Width | 1898 mm | 1864 mm | Lancia +34 mm |
| Height | 1664 mm | 1571 mm | Lancia +93 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2791 mm | — | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Lancia Gamma
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Lancia Gamma
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Lancia Gamma or Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?
The Lancia Gamma goes further: 741 km WLTP against the 600 km of the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross. That is a difference of 141 km.
Which charges faster?
The Lancia Gamma accepts up to 160 kW DC, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross up to 150 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Lancia Gamma uses less electricity: 16.2 kWh/100 km against 16.7 kWh/100 km in the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 75 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.