Changan Deepal S05 vs Peugeot E-3008
Changan Deepal S05 leads 6 to 3
Biggest differences: WLTP range — Changan Deepal S05 488 km, Peugeot E-3008 698 km · Battery — Changan Deepal S05 68.8 kWh, Peugeot E-3008 96.9 kWh · DC charging — Changan Deepal S05 200 kW, Peugeot E-3008 160 kW.
Changan Deepal S05
Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in two variants: the RWD Max with a WLTP range of 488 km and the AWD Max with 435 hp.
Peugeot E-3008
Peugeot E-3008 is a C-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in three variants: WLTP range from 497 to 698 km, power from 213 to 325 hp.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S05 vs Peugeot E-3008
- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
Peugeot E-3008230 Long Range
Changan Deepal S05 or Peugeot E-3008 — who wins where
Changan Deepal S05 leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot E-3008 +210 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot E-3008 +28.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmChangan Deepal S05 −1.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSChangan Deepal S05 +41 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sChangan Deepal S05 −1.2 s
- Top speed km/hChangan Deepal S05 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWChangan Deepal S05 +40 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgChangan Deepal S05 −226 kg
- Boot lPeugeot E-3008 +28 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S05 vs Peugeot E-3008
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Peugeot E-3008 230 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 488 km | 698 km | Peugeot +210 km |
| Battery | 68.8 kWh | 96.9 kWh | Peugeot +28.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 17.1 kWh/100 km | Changan −1.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 200 kW | 160 kW | Changan +40 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 23 min 10–80% | 27 min 20–80% | 4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.9 km/min | 15.5 km/min | Peugeot +0.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 231 PS | Changan +41 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.5 s | 8.7 s | Changan −1.2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h | Changan +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1940 kg | 2166 kg | Changan −226 kg |
| Boot | 492 l | 520 l | Peugeot +28 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4598 mm | 4542 mm | Changan +56 mm |
| Width | 1900 mm | 1895 mm | Changan +5 mm |
| Height | 1600 mm | 1641 mm | Peugeot +41 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm | 2739 mm | Changan +141 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S05
Peugeot E-3008
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S05
Peugeot E-3008
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S05 or Peugeot E-3008?
The Peugeot E-3008 goes further: 698 km WLTP against the 488 km of the Changan Deepal S05. That is a difference of 210 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Changan Deepal S05 and the Peugeot E-3008 differ?
The Changan Deepal S05 has RWD and 272 PS. The Peugeot E-3008 has FWD and 231 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Changan Deepal S05 accepts up to 200 kW DC, the Peugeot E-3008 up to 160 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Changan Deepal S05 uses less electricity: 15.9 kWh/100 km against 17.1 kWh/100 km in the Peugeot E-3008. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 180 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.