Changan Deepal S05 vs MG S5 EV

Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Changan Deepal S05 23 min, MG S5 EV 28 min · DC charging — Changan Deepal S05 168 kW, MG S5 EV 139 kW · 0–100 km/h — Changan Deepal S05 7.5 s, MG S5 EV 6.3 s.

Changan Deepal S05

The Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV offering two powertrain options, with power ranging from 272 horsepower to 435 horsepower.

MG S5 EV

The MG S5 EV is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and motor power outputs.

Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S05 vs MG S5 EV

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Changan Deepal S05 or MG S5 EV — who wins where

Changan Deepal S05 leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmChangan Deepal S05 +8 km
    Changan Deepal S05
    488
    MG S5 EV
    480
  • Battery kWhChangan Deepal S05 +4.8 kWh
    Changan Deepal S05
    68.8
    MG S5 EV
    64
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmMG S5 EV −0.4 kWh/100 km
    Changan Deepal S05
    15.9
    MG S5 EV
    15.5
  • Power PSChangan Deepal S05 +41 PS
    Changan Deepal S05
    272
    MG S5 EV
    231
  • 0–100 km/h sMG S5 EV −1.2 s
    Changan Deepal S05
    7.5
    MG S5 EV
    6.3
  • Top speed km/hMG S5 EV +10 km/h
    Changan Deepal S05
    180
    MG S5 EV
    190
  • DC charging kWChangan Deepal S05 +29 kW
    Changan Deepal S05
    168
    MG S5 EV
    139
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Changan Deepal S05
    11
    MG S5 EV
    11
  • Charging minChangan Deepal S05 −5 min
    Changan Deepal S05
    23
    MG S5 EV
    28
  • Weight kgMG S5 EV −260 kg
    Changan Deepal S05
    1940
    MG S5 EV
    1680
  • Boot lChangan Deepal S05 +39 l
    Changan Deepal S05
    492
    MG S5 EV
    453

Add a third car

Technical data: Changan Deepal S05 vs MG S5 EV

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Changan Deepal S05 vs MG S5 EV
Key parameters Changan Deepal S05
RWD Max
MG S5 EV
Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range488 km480 kmChangan +8 km
Battery68.8 kWh64 kWhChangan +4.8 kWh
Consumption15.9 kWh/100 km15.5 kWh/100 kmMG −0.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging168 kW139 kWChangan +29 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%23 min28 minChangan −5 min
Range per minute of charging14.9 km/min12 km/minChangan +2.9 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power272 PS231 PSChangan +41 PS
0–100 km/h7.5 s6.3 sMG −1.2 s
Top speed180 km/h190 km/hMG +10 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight1940 kg1680 kgMG −260 kg
Boot492 l453 lChangan +39 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4598 mm4476 mmChangan +122 mm
Width1900 mm1849 mmChangan +51 mm
Height1600 mm1621 mmMG +21 mm
Wheelbase2880 mm2730 mmChangan +150 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Changan Deepal S05

Cost per 100 km4.77
Monthly60
Yearly716

MG S5 EV

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Changan Deepal S05

MG S5 EV

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which charges faster?

The Changan Deepal S05 accepts up to 168 kW DC, the MG S5 EV up to 139 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 23 and 28 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The MG S5 EV uses less electricity: 15.5 kWh/100 km against 15.9 kWh/100 km in the Changan Deepal S05. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 60 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.