Changan Deepal S05 vs Škoda Elroq
Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S05 168 kW, Škoda Elroq 135 kW · Charging 10–80% — Changan Deepal S05 23 min, Škoda Elroq 28 min · WLTP range — Changan Deepal S05 488 km, Škoda Elroq 573 km.
Changan Deepal S05
The Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV offering two powertrain options, with power ranging from 272 horsepower to 435 horsepower.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S05 vs Škoda Elroq
- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
Škoda Elroq85
Changan Deepal S05 or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +85 km
- Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +8.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −0.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +14 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −0.9 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWChangan Deepal S05 +33 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minChangan Deepal S05 −5 min
- Weight ↓ kgChangan Deepal S05 −110 kg
- Boot lChangan Deepal S05 +22 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S05 vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Škoda Elroq 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 488 km | 573 km | Škoda +85 km |
| Battery | 68.8 kWh | 77 kWh | Škoda +8.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 15.2 kWh/100 km | Škoda −0.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 168 kW | 135 kW | Changan +33 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 23 min | 28 min | Changan −5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.9 km/min | 14.3 km/min | Changan +0.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 286 PS | Škoda +14 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.5 s | 6.6 s | Škoda −0.9 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1940 kg | 2050 kg | Changan −110 kg |
| Boot | 492 l | 470 l | Changan +22 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Changan |
| Length | 4598 mm | 4488 mm | Changan +110 mm |
| Width | 1900 mm | 1884 mm | Changan +16 mm |
| Height | 1600 mm | 1625 mm | Škoda +25 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm | 2765 mm | Changan +115 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S05
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S05
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S05 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 488 km of the Changan Deepal S05. That is a difference of 85 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S05 — its 68.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Elroq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Changan Deepal S05 accepts up to 168 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 135 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 23 and 28 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Škoda Elroq uses less electricity: 15.2 kWh/100 km against 15.9 kWh/100 km in the Changan Deepal S05. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 105 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.