Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Peugeot E-3008
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 2
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 6.6 s, Peugeot E-3008 8.7 s · Consumption — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 13.4 kWh/100 km, Peugeot E-3008 17.1 kWh/100 km · Battery — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 77 kWh, Peugeot E-3008 96.9 kWh.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a C-segment coupe SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 451 to 576 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
Peugeot E-3008
Peugeot E-3008 is a C-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in three variants: WLTP range from 497 to 698 km, power from 213 to 325 hp.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Peugeot E-3008
Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance
Peugeot E-3008230 Long Range
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Peugeot E-3008 — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot E-3008 +122 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot E-3008 +19.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −3.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +55 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −2.1 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +5 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +7 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Peugeot E-3008
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron e-tron performance | Peugeot E-3008 230 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 698 km | Peugeot +122 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 96.9 kWh | Peugeot +19.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.4 kWh/100 km | 17.1 kWh/100 km | Audi −3.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 160 kW | Audi +5 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 20–80% ↓ | — | 27 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 15.5 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 231 PS | Audi +55 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 8.7 s | Audi −2.1 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 2166 kg | — |
| Boot | 527 l | 520 l | Audi +7 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Peugeot |
| Length | — | 4542 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1895 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1641 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2739 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Peugeot E-3008
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Peugeot E-3008
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Peugeot E-3008?
The Peugeot E-3008 goes further: 698 km WLTP against the 576 km of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron. That is a difference of 122 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the Peugeot E-3008 differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The Peugeot E-3008 has FWD and 231 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Peugeot E-3008 — its 96.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Peugeot E-3008 up to 160 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.