Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Peugeot E-3008
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 6.7 s, Peugeot E-3008 8.7 s · Battery — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 77 kWh, Peugeot E-3008 96.9 kWh · Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, Peugeot E-3008 231 PS.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering four different drive variants with varying power outputs and ranges.
Peugeot E-3008
The Peugeot E-3008 is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Peugeot E-3008
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron45
Peugeot E-3008230 Long Range
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Peugeot E-3008 — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot E-3008 +125 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot E-3008 +19.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −1.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +55 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −2 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +15 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −96 kg
- Boot lPeugeot E-3008 +53 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Peugeot E-3008
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 45 | Peugeot E-3008 230 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 573 km | 698 km | Peugeot +125 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 96.9 kWh | Peugeot +19.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.4 kWh/100 km | 17.1 kWh/100 km | Audi −1.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 175 kW | 160 kW | Audi +15 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 28 min 10–80% | 27 min 20–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 15.5 km/min | Peugeot +1.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 231 PS | Audi +55 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.7 s | 8.7 s | Audi −2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h | Audi +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2070 kg | 2166 kg | Audi −96 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 588 l | Peugeot +53 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Peugeot |
| Length | 4588 mm | 4542 mm | Audi +46 mm |
| Width | 1865 mm | 1895 mm | Peugeot +30 mm |
| Height | 1614 mm | 1641 mm | Peugeot +27 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2764 mm | 2739 mm | Audi +25 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Peugeot E-3008
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Peugeot E-3008
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Peugeot E-3008?
The Peugeot E-3008 goes further: 698 km WLTP against the 573 km of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron. That is a difference of 125 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the Peugeot E-3008 differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The Peugeot E-3008 has FWD and 231 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Peugeot E-3008 — its 96.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 175 kW DC, the Peugeot E-3008 up to 160 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.