Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Škoda Elroq
It's a tie: 2 to 2
Biggest differences: Consumption — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 13.4 kWh/100 km, Škoda Elroq 15.5 kWh/100 km · Boot — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 527 l, Škoda Elroq 470 l · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 6.6 s, Škoda Elroq 6.2 s.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a C-segment coupe SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 451 to 576 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, available with either RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs ranging from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 576 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Škoda Elroq
Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance
Škoda Elroq85x
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
It's a tie: 2 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmNo difference
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −2.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +13 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +57 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron e-tron performance | Škoda Elroq 85x | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 576 km | No difference |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 77 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.4 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 165 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 29 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 13.9 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 299 PS | Škoda +13 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 6.2 s | Škoda −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 2132 kg | — |
| Boot | 527 l | 470 l | Audi +57 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Škoda |
| Length | — | 4488 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1884 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1620 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2766 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The Škoda Elroq has AWD and 299 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Škoda Elroq — its 77 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron takes more: 527 l against 470 l in the Škoda Elroq. The difference is 57 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 165 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.