Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Škoda Elroq

Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 175 kW, Škoda Elroq 135 kW · Boot — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 535 l, Škoda Elroq 470 l.

Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron

The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering four different drive variants with varying power outputs and ranges.

Škoda Elroq

The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Škoda Elroq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Škoda Elroq — who wins where

Škoda Elroq leads 3 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmNo difference
    Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
    573
    Škoda Elroq
    573
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
    77
    Škoda Elroq
    77
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −0.2 kWh/100 km
    Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
    15.4
    Škoda Elroq
    15.2
  • Power PSNo difference
    Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
    286
    Škoda Elroq
    286
  • 0–100 km/h sŠkoda Elroq −0.1 s
    Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
    6.7
    Škoda Elroq
    6.6
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
    180
    Škoda Elroq
    180
  • DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +40 kW
    Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
    175
    Škoda Elroq
    135
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
    11
    Škoda Elroq
    11
  • Charging minNo difference
    Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
    28
    Škoda Elroq
    28
  • Weight kgŠkoda Elroq −20 kg
    Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
    2070
    Škoda Elroq
    2050
  • Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +65 l
    Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
    535
    Škoda Elroq
    470

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Škoda Elroq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Škoda Elroq
Key parameters Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
45
Škoda Elroq
85
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range573 km573 kmNo difference
Battery77 kWh77 kWhNo difference
Consumption15.4 kWh/100 km15.2 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −0.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging175 kW135 kWAudi +40 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%28 min28 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging14.3 km/min14.3 km/minNo difference
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power286 PS286 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h6.7 s6.6 sŠkoda −0.1 s
Top speed180 km/h180 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2070 kg2050 kgŠkoda −20 kg
Boot535 l470 lAudi +65 l
Length4588 mm4488 mmAudi +100 mm
Width1865 mm1884 mmŠkoda +19 mm
Height1614 mm1625 mmŠkoda +11 mm
Wheelbase2764 mm2765 mmŠkoda +1 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.62
Monthly58
Yearly693

Škoda Elroq

Cost per 100 km4.56
Monthly57
Yearly684

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron

Škoda Elroq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the bigger boot?

The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron takes more: 535 l against 470 l in the Škoda Elroq. The difference is 65 l.

Which charges faster?

The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 175 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 135 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 28 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.