Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Volvo EC40
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 4 to 3
Biggest differences: Boot — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 527 l, Volvo EC40 404 l · DC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 165 kW, Volvo EC40 200 kW · Consumption — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 13.4 kWh/100 km, Volvo EC40 16.2 kWh/100 km.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a C-segment coupe SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 451 to 576 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
Volvo EC40
The Volvo EC40 (C40 until 2024) is an electric C-segment crossover with drive on one or both axles and a WLTP range of up to 583 km.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Volvo EC40
Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance
Volvo EC40Single Motor Extended Range
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Volvo EC40 — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 4 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EC40 +7 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EC40 +5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −2.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +34 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −0.7 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWVolvo EC40 +35 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +123 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Volvo EC40
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron e-tron performance | Volvo EC40 Single Motor Extended Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 583 km | Volvo +7 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 82 kWh | Volvo +5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.4 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 200 kW | Volvo +35 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 28 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 14.6 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 252 PS | Audi +34 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.3 s | Audi −0.7 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 2020 kg | — |
| Boot | 527 l | 404 l | Audi +123 l |
| Length | — | 4440 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1873 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1591 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2702 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Volvo EC40
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Volvo EC40
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the bigger boot?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron takes more: 527 l against 404 l in the Volvo EC40. The difference is 123 l.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Volvo EC40 up to 200 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron uses less electricity: 13.4 kWh/100 km against 16.2 kWh/100 km in the Volvo EC40. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 420 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.