Lancia Gamma vs Volvo EC40
Volvo EC40 leads 5 to 4
Biggest differences: AC charging — Lancia Gamma 7 kW, Volvo EC40 11 kW · Boot — Lancia Gamma 560 l, Volvo EC40 404 l · WLTP range — Lancia Gamma 741 km, Volvo EC40 583 km.
Lancia Gamma
The Lancia Gamma is an all-electric crossover in the C segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 543 to 741 km, power ranging from 230 to 350 horsepower, and DC fast charging at 160 kW.
Volvo EC40
The Volvo EC40 (C40 until 2024) is an electric C-segment crossover with drive on one or both axles and a WLTP range of up to 583 km.
Profile against the market: Lancia Gamma vs Volvo EC40
Lancia GammaLong Range
Volvo EC40Single Motor Extended Range
Lancia Gamma or Volvo EC40 — who wins where
Volvo EC40 leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLancia Gamma +158 km
- Battery kWhLancia Gamma +15.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNo difference
- Power PSVolvo EC40 +7 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EC40 −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hLancia Gamma +10 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EC40 +40 kW
- AC charging kWVolvo EC40 +4 kW
- Weight ↓ kgVolvo EC40 −115 kg
- Boot lLancia Gamma +156 l
Technical data: Lancia Gamma vs Volvo EC40
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Lancia Gamma Long Range | Volvo EC40 Single Motor Extended Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 741 km | 583 km | Lancia +158 km |
| Battery | 97.2 kWh | 82 kWh | Lancia +15.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.2 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | No difference |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 200 kW | Volvo +40 kW |
| AC charging | 7 kW | 11 kW | Volvo +4 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 16.5 km/min | 14.6 km/min | Lancia +1.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 245 PS | 252 PS | Volvo +7 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.8 s | 7.3 s | Volvo −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 190 km/h | 180 km/h | Lancia +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2135 kg | 2020 kg | Volvo −115 kg |
| Boot | 560 l | 404 l | Lancia +156 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Lancia |
| Length | 4672 mm | 4440 mm | Lancia +232 mm |
| Width | 1898 mm | 1873 mm | Lancia +25 mm |
| Height | 1664 mm | 1591 mm | Lancia +73 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2791 mm | 2702 mm | Lancia +89 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Lancia Gamma
Volvo EC40
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Lancia Gamma
Volvo EC40
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Lancia Gamma or Volvo EC40?
The Lancia Gamma goes further: 741 km WLTP against the 583 km of the Volvo EC40. That is a difference of 158 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Lancia Gamma and the Volvo EC40 differ?
The Lancia Gamma has FWD and 245 PS. The Volvo EC40 has RWD and 252 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Lancia Gamma — its 97.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Volvo EC40, with 82 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Lancia Gamma takes more: 560 l against 404 l in the Volvo EC40. The difference is 156 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.