Subaru Uncharted vs Volvo EC40
Volvo EC40 leads 6 to 4
Biggest differences: AC charging — Subaru Uncharted 22 kW, Volvo EC40 11 kW · DC charging — Subaru Uncharted 150 kW, Volvo EC40 200 kW · Consumption — Subaru Uncharted 13.8 kWh/100 km, Volvo EC40 16.2 kWh/100 km.
Subaru Uncharted
The Subaru Uncharted is an SUV in the C segment, offering three different drive configurations with varying ranges and performance, from 451 km to 592 km in the WLTP cycle.
Volvo EC40
The Volvo EC40 (C40 until 2024) is an electric C-segment crossover with drive on one or both axles and a WLTP range of up to 583 km.
Profile against the market: Subaru Uncharted vs Volvo EC40
Subaru Uncharted77 kWh FWD
Volvo EC40Single Motor Extended Range
Subaru Uncharted or Volvo EC40 — who wins where
Volvo EC40 leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmSubaru Uncharted +9 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EC40 +5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmSubaru Uncharted −2.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EC40 +28 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo difference
- Top speed km/hVolvo EC40 +20 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EC40 +50 kW
- AC charging kWSubaru Uncharted +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EC40 −2 min
- Weight ↓ kgSubaru Uncharted −104 kg
- Boot lVolvo EC40 +1 l
Technical data: Subaru Uncharted vs Volvo EC40
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Subaru Uncharted 77 kWh FWD | Volvo EC40 Single Motor Extended Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 592 km | 583 km | Subaru +9 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 82 kWh | Volvo +5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.8 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | Subaru −2.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 200 kW | Volvo +50 kW |
| AC charging | 22 kW | 11 kW | Subaru +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 30 min | 28 min | Volvo −2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 13.8 km/min | 14.6 km/min | Volvo +0.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 224 PS | 252 PS | Volvo +28 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | No difference |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 180 km/h | Volvo +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1916 kg | 2020 kg | Subaru −104 kg |
| Boot | 403 l | 404 l | Volvo +1 l |
| Length | 4535 mm | 4440 mm | Subaru +95 mm |
| Width | 1870 mm | 1873 mm | Volvo +3 mm |
| Height | 1625 mm | 1591 mm | Subaru +34 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2750 mm | 2702 mm | Subaru +48 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Subaru Uncharted
Volvo EC40
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Subaru Uncharted
Volvo EC40
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Volvo EC40 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Subaru Uncharted?
The Volvo EC40 carries 82 kWh and covers 583 km, while the Subaru Uncharted with its 77 kWh battery does 592 km. Energy use decides it: 16.2 against 13.8 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Subaru Uncharted and the Volvo EC40 differ?
The Subaru Uncharted has FWD and 224 PS. The Volvo EC40 has RWD and 252 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Subaru Uncharted accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Volvo EC40 up to 200 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 30 and 28 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Subaru Uncharted uses less electricity: 13.8 kWh/100 km against 16.2 kWh/100 km in the Volvo EC40. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 360 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.