Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Lancia Gamma
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 5 to 4
Biggest differences: AC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 11 kW, Lancia Gamma 7 kW · WLTP range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 576 km, Lancia Gamma 741 km · Battery — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 77 kWh, Lancia Gamma 97.2 kWh.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is a C-segment coupe SUV, in model year 2027 in four variants: WLTP range from 451 to 576 km, power from 204 to 340 hp.
Lancia Gamma
The Lancia Gamma is an all-electric crossover in the C segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 543 to 741 km, power ranging from 230 to 350 horsepower, and DC fast charging at 160 kW.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Lancia Gamma
Audi Q4 Sportback e-trone-tron performance
Lancia GammaLong Range
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Lancia Gamma — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 5 to 4
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLancia Gamma +165 km
- Battery kWhLancia Gamma +20.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −2.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +41 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −1.2 s
- Top speed km/hLancia Gamma +10 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +5 kW
- AC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +4 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lLancia Gamma +33 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Lancia Gamma
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron e-tron performance | Lancia Gamma Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 741 km | Lancia +165 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 97.2 kWh | Lancia +20.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.4 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | Audi −2.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 160 kW | Audi +5 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 7 kW | Audi +4 kW |
| Charging 20–80% ↓ | — | 27 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 16.5 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 245 PS | Audi +41 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.8 s | Audi −1.2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 190 km/h | Lancia +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 2135 kg | — |
| Boot | 527 l | 560 l | Lancia +33 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Lancia |
| Length | — | 4672 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1898 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1664 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2791 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Lancia Gamma
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Lancia Gamma
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Lancia Gamma?
The Lancia Gamma goes further: 741 km WLTP against the 576 km of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron. That is a difference of 165 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the Lancia Gamma differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The Lancia Gamma has FWD and 245 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Lancia Gamma — its 97.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Lancia Gamma up to 160 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.