Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Nissan Leaf
Biggest differences: Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, Nissan Leaf 217 PS · Boot — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 535 l, Nissan Leaf 437 l · DC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 175 kW, Nissan Leaf 150 kW.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering four different drive variants with varying power outputs and ranges.
Nissan Leaf
The Nissan Leaf is a crossover in the C segment with front-wheel drive, offering two battery options and a range of up to 622 kilometers (in the MY2026 model).
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Nissan Leaf
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Nissan Leaf — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmNissan Leaf +49 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNissan Leaf −1.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +69 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −0.9 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +20 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +25 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgNissan Leaf −187 kg
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +98 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Nissan Leaf
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron45 |  Nissan Leaf75 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 573 km | 622 km | Nissan +49 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 75 kWh | Audi +2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.4 kWh/100 km | 13.8 kWh/100 km | Nissan −1.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 175 kW | 150 kW | Audi +25 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 28 min 10–80% | 30 min 20–80% | 2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 12.4 km/min | Audi +1.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 217 PS | Audi +69 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.7 s | 7.6 s | Audi −0.9 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | Audi +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2070 kg | 1883 kg | Nissan −187 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 437 l | Audi +98 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Nissan |
| Length | 4588 mm | 4350 mm | Audi +238 mm |
| Width | 1865 mm | 1810 mm | Audi +55 mm |
| Height | 1614 mm | 1550 mm | Audi +64 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2764 mm | 2690 mm | Audi +74 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Nissan Leaf
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Nissan Leaf?
The Nissan Leaf goes further: 622 km WLTP against the 573 km of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron. That is a difference of 49 km.
Why does the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Nissan Leaf?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron carries 77 kWh and covers 573 km, while the Nissan Leaf with its 75 kWh battery does 622 km. Energy use decides it: 15.4 against 13.8 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the Nissan Leaf differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The Nissan Leaf has FWD and 217 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Nissan Leaf — its 75 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.