Renault Scenic vs Toyota C-HR+
Biggest differences: Boot — Renault Scenic 545 l, Toyota C-HR+ 416 l · Consumption — Renault Scenic 16.9 kWh/100 km, Toyota C-HR+ 13.4 kWh/100 km · Battery — Renault Scenic 87 kWh, Toyota C-HR+ 72 kWh.
Renault Scenic
The electric SUV in the C-segment offers two drive variants with different battery capacities and motor power.
Toyota C-HR+
The Toyota C-HR+ is a crossover in the C segment that offers three different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges, with a top speed of up to 180 km/h.
Profile against the market: Renault Scenic vs Toyota C-HR+
Renault ScenicLong Range 87 kWh
Toyota C-HR+77 kWh
Renault Scenic or Toyota C-HR+ — who wins where
Renault Scenic leads 5 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmRenault Scenic +18 km
- Battery kWhRenault Scenic +15 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmToyota C-HR+ −3.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSToyota C-HR+ +4 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sToyota C-HR+ −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hRenault Scenic +10 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Scenic −37 kg
- Boot lRenault Scenic +129 l
Technical data: Renault Scenic vs Toyota C-HR+
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Renault Scenic Long Range 87 kWh | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 624 km | 606 km | Renault +18 km |
| Battery | 87 kWh | 72 kWh | Renault +15 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.9 kWh/100 km | 13.4 kWh/100 km | Toyota −3.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 150 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 37 min 15–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 9 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 11 km/min | 15.2 km/min | Toyota +4.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 220 PS | 224 PS | Toyota +4 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.9 s | 7.4 s | Toyota −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 160 km/h | Renault +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1853 kg | 1890 kg | Renault −37 kg |
| Boot | 545 l | 416 l | Renault +129 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4470 mm | 4520 mm | Toyota +50 mm |
| Width | 1864 mm | 1870 mm | Toyota +6 mm |
| Height | 1571 mm | 1595 mm | Toyota +24 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2785 mm | 2750 mm | Renault +35 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Renault Scenic
Toyota C-HR+
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Renault Scenic
Toyota C-HR+
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Renault Scenic or Toyota C-HR+?
The Renault Scenic goes further: 624 km WLTP against the 606 km of the Toyota C-HR+. That is a difference of 18 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Renault Scenic takes more: 545 l against 416 l in the Toyota C-HR+. The difference is 129 l.
Which charges faster?
The Renault Scenic accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Toyota C-HR+ up to 150 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Toyota C-HR+ uses less electricity: 13.4 kWh/100 km against 16.9 kWh/100 km in the Renault Scenic. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 525 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.