SERES 3 vs Toyota C-HR+

Biggest differences: WLTP range — SERES 3 300 km, Toyota C-HR+ 606 km · Power — SERES 3 160 PS, Toyota C-HR+ 224 PS · Battery — SERES 3 54 kWh, Toyota C-HR+ 72 kWh.

SERES 3

The electric SUV belongs to the C-segment and is equipped with front-wheel drive and a 54 kWh battery.

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C-HR+ is a crossover in the C segment that offers three different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges, with a top speed of up to 180 km/h.

Profile against the market: SERES 3 vs Toyota C-HR+

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

SERES 3 or Toyota C-HR+ — who wins where

Toyota C-HR+ leads 7 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmToyota C-HR+ +306 km
    SERES 3
    300
    Toyota C-HR+
    606
  • Battery kWhToyota C-HR+ +18 kWh
    SERES 3
    54
    Toyota C-HR+
    72
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmToyota C-HR+ −4.2 kWh/100 km
    SERES 3
    17.6
    Toyota C-HR+
    13.4
  • Power PSToyota C-HR+ +64 PS
    SERES 3
    160
    Toyota C-HR+
    224
  • 0–100 km/h sToyota C-HR+ −1.5 s
    SERES 3
    8.9
    Toyota C-HR+
    7.4
  • Top speed km/hToyota C-HR+ +5 km/h
    SERES 3
    155
    Toyota C-HR+
    160
  • DC charging kWNo data
    SERES 3
    Toyota C-HR+
    150
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    SERES 3
    11
    Toyota C-HR+
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    SERES 3
    Toyota C-HR+
    28
  • Weight kgSERES 3 −125 kg
    SERES 3
    1765
    Toyota C-HR+
    1890
  • Boot lToyota C-HR+ +98 l
    SERES 3
    318
    Toyota C-HR+
    416

Add a third car

Technical data: SERES 3 vs Toyota C-HR+

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: SERES 3 vs Toyota C-HR+
Key parameters SERES 3
Standard
Toyota C-HR+
77 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range300 km606 kmToyota +306 km
Battery54 kWh72 kWhToyota +18 kWh
Consumption17.6 kWh/100 km13.4 kWh/100 kmToyota −4.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%28 min
Range per minute of charging15.2 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power160 PS224 PSToyota +64 PS
0–100 km/h8.9 s7.4 sToyota −1.5 s
Top speed155 km/h160 km/hToyota +5 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1765 kg1890 kgSERES −125 kg
Boot318 l416 lToyota +98 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Toyota
Length4415 mm4520 mmToyota +105 mm
Width1850 mm1870 mmToyota +20 mm
Height1650 mm1595 mmSERES +55 mm
Wheelbase2750 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

SERES 3

Cost per 100 km5.28
Monthly66
Yearly792

Toyota C-HR+

Cost per 100 km4.02
Monthly50
Yearly603

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

SERES 3

Toyota C-HR+

Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — SERES 3 or Toyota C-HR+?

The Toyota C-HR+ goes further: 606 km WLTP against the 300 km of the SERES 3. That is a difference of 306 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Toyota C-HR+ — its 72 kWh battery then works as a power source. The SERES 3, with 54 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — SERES 3 or Toyota C-HR+?

The Toyota C-HR+ is stronger: 224 PS against the 160 PS of the SERES 3. The gap is 64 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Toyota C-HR+ takes more: 416 l against 318 l in the SERES 3. The difference is 98 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.