SERES 3 vs Škoda Elroq
Biggest differences: WLTP range — SERES 3 300 km, Škoda Elroq 573 km · Power — SERES 3 160 PS, Škoda Elroq 286 PS · Boot — SERES 3 318 l, Škoda Elroq 470 l.
SERES 3
The electric SUV belongs to the C-segment and is equipped with front-wheel drive and a 54 kWh battery.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.
Profile against the market: SERES 3 vs Škoda Elroq
SERES 3Standard
Škoda Elroq85
SERES 3 or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 7 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +273 km
- Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +23 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −2.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +126 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −2.3 s
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +25 km/h
- DC charging kWNo data
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgSERES 3 −285 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Elroq +152 l
Technical data: SERES 3 vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | SERES 3 Standard | Škoda Elroq 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 300 km | 573 km | Škoda +273 km |
| Battery | 54 kWh | 77 kWh | Škoda +23 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.6 kWh/100 km | 15.2 kWh/100 km | Škoda −2.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | — | 135 kW | — |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 28 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 14.3 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 160 PS | 286 PS | Škoda +126 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.9 s | 6.6 s | Škoda −2.3 s |
| Top speed | 155 km/h | 180 km/h | Škoda +25 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1765 kg | 2050 kg | SERES −285 kg |
| Boot | 318 l | 470 l | Škoda +152 l |
| Length | 4415 mm | 4488 mm | Škoda +73 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm | 1884 mm | Škoda +34 mm |
| Height | 1650 mm | 1625 mm | SERES +25 mm |
| Wheelbase | — | 2765 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
SERES 3
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — SERES 3 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 300 km of the SERES 3. That is a difference of 273 km.
How do the drivetrains of the SERES 3 and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The SERES 3 has FWD and 160 PS. The Škoda Elroq has RWD and 286 PS.
Which is more powerful — SERES 3 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq is stronger: 286 PS against the 160 PS of the SERES 3. The gap is 126 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Škoda Elroq takes more: 470 l against 318 l in the SERES 3. The difference is 152 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.