SERES 3 vs Škoda Elroq
Škoda Elroq leads 7 to 1
Biggest differences: WLTP range — SERES 3 300 km, Škoda Elroq 576 km · Power — SERES 3 160 PS, Škoda Elroq 299 PS · Boot — SERES 3 318 l, Škoda Elroq 470 l.
SERES 3
The electric SUV belongs to the C-segment and is equipped with front-wheel drive and a 54 kWh battery.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, available with either RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs ranging from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 576 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Profile against the market: SERES 3 vs Škoda Elroq
SERES 3Standard
Škoda Elroq85x
SERES 3 or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 7 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +276 km
- Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +23 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −2.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +139 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −2.7 s
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +25 km/h
- DC charging kWNo data
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgSERES 3 −367 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Elroq +152 l
Technical data: SERES 3 vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | SERES 3 Standard | Škoda Elroq 85x | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 300 km | 576 km | Škoda +276 km |
| Battery | 54 kWh | 77 kWh | Škoda +23 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.6 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km | Škoda −2.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | — | 165 kW | — |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 29 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 13.9 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 160 PS | 299 PS | Škoda +139 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.9 s | 6.2 s | Škoda −2.7 s |
| Top speed | 155 km/h | 180 km/h | Škoda +25 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1765 kg | 2132 kg | SERES −367 kg |
| Boot | 318 l | 470 l | Škoda +152 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Škoda |
| Length | 4415 mm | 4488 mm | Škoda +73 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm | 1884 mm | Škoda +34 mm |
| Height | 1650 mm | 1620 mm | SERES +30 mm |
| Wheelbase | — | 2766 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
SERES 3
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — SERES 3 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 300 km of the SERES 3. That is a difference of 276 km.
How do the drivetrains of the SERES 3 and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The SERES 3 has FWD and 160 PS. The Škoda Elroq has AWD and 299 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Škoda Elroq — its 77 kWh battery then works as a power source. The SERES 3, with 54 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — SERES 3 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq is stronger: 299 PS against the 160 PS of the SERES 3. The gap is 139 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.