Renault Scenic vs SERES 3

Biggest differences: WLTP range — Renault Scenic 624 km, SERES 3 300 km · Boot — Renault Scenic 545 l, SERES 3 318 l · Battery — Renault Scenic 87 kWh, SERES 3 54 kWh.

Renault Scenic

The electric SUV in the C-segment offers two drive variants with different battery capacities and motor power.

SERES 3

The electric SUV belongs to the C-segment and is equipped with front-wheel drive and a 54 kWh battery.

Profile against the market: Renault Scenic vs SERES 3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Renault Scenic or SERES 3 — who wins where

Renault Scenic leads 7 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmRenault Scenic +324 km
    Renault Scenic
    624
    SERES 3
    300
  • Battery kWhRenault Scenic +33 kWh
    Renault Scenic
    87
    SERES 3
    54
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmRenault Scenic −0.7 kWh/100 km
    Renault Scenic
    16.9
    SERES 3
    17.6
  • Power PSRenault Scenic +60 PS
    Renault Scenic
    220
    SERES 3
    160
  • 0–100 km/h sRenault Scenic −1 s
    Renault Scenic
    7.9
    SERES 3
    8.9
  • Top speed km/hRenault Scenic +15 km/h
    Renault Scenic
    170
    SERES 3
    155
  • DC charging kWNo data
    Renault Scenic
    150
    SERES 3
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Renault Scenic
    11
    SERES 3
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    Renault Scenic
    37
    SERES 3
  • Weight kgSERES 3 −88 kg
    Renault Scenic
    1853
    SERES 3
    1765
  • Boot lRenault Scenic +227 l
    Renault Scenic
    545
    SERES 3
    318

Add a third car

Technical data: Renault Scenic vs SERES 3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Renault Scenic vs SERES 3
Key parameters Renault Scenic
Long Range 87 kWh
SERES 3
Standard
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range624 km300 kmRenault +324 km
Battery87 kWh54 kWhRenault +33 kWh
Consumption16.9 kWh/100 km17.6 kWh/100 kmRenault −0.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 15–80%37 min
Range per minute of charging11 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power220 PS160 PSRenault +60 PS
0–100 km/h7.9 s8.9 sRenault −1 s
Top speed170 km/h155 km/hRenault +15 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1853 kg1765 kgSERES −88 kg
Boot545 l318 lRenault +227 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Renault
Length4470 mm4415 mmRenault +55 mm
Width1864 mm1850 mmRenault +14 mm
Height1571 mm1650 mmSERES +79 mm
Wheelbase2785 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Renault Scenic

Cost per 100 km5.07
Monthly63
Yearly760

SERES 3

Cost per 100 km5.28
Monthly66
Yearly792

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Renault Scenic

SERES 3

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Renault Scenic or SERES 3?

The Renault Scenic goes further: 624 km WLTP against the 300 km of the SERES 3. That is a difference of 324 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Renault Scenic — its 87 kWh battery then works as a power source. The SERES 3, with 54 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Renault Scenic or SERES 3?

The Renault Scenic is stronger: 220 PS against the 160 PS of the SERES 3. The gap is 60 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Renault Scenic takes more: 545 l against 318 l in the SERES 3. The difference is 227 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.