Renault Megane E-Tech vs Renault Scenic
Renault Megane E-Tech leads 5 to 4
Biggest differences: Battery — Renault Megane E-Tech 67 kWh, Renault Scenic 89 kWh · WLTP range — Renault Megane E-Tech 500 km, Renault Scenic 642 km · Boot — Renault Megane E-Tech 440 l, Renault Scenic 545 l.
Renault Megane E-Tech
An electric crossover in the C-segment, offering a range of up to 500 km and fast charging (DC).
Renault Scenic
An electric SUV in the C segment, offering two battery options with a range of up to 642 km according to the WLTP standard.
Profile against the market: Renault Megane E-Tech vs Renault Scenic
Renault Megane E-TechComfort Range 67 kWh- Renault ScenicLong Range 89 kWh
Renault Megane E-Tech or Renault Scenic — who wins where
Renault Megane E-Tech leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmRenault Scenic +142 km
- Battery kWhRenault Scenic +22 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmRenault Megane E-Tech −1.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sRenault Megane E-Tech −0.3 s
- Top speed km/hRenault Scenic +10 km/h
- DC charging kWRenault Megane E-Tech +15 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minRenault Megane E-Tech −4 min
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Megane E-Tech −139 kg
- Boot lRenault Scenic +105 l
Technical data: Renault Megane E-Tech vs Renault Scenic
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Renault Megane E-Tech Comfort Range 67 kWh | Renault Scenic Long Range 89 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 500 km | 642 km | Renault +142 km |
| Battery | 67 kWh | 89 kWh | Renault +22 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.7 kWh/100 km | 16.8 kWh/100 km | Renault −1.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 150 kW | Renault +15 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 15–80% ↓ | 24 min | 28 min | Renault −4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 13.5 km/min | 14.9 km/min | Renault +1.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 218 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.6 s | 7.9 s | Renault −0.3 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 170 km/h | Renault +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1772 kg | 1911 kg | Renault −139 kg |
| Boot | 440 l | 545 l | Renault +105 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4200 mm | 4470 mm | Renault +270 mm |
| Width | 1768 mm | 1864 mm | Renault +96 mm |
| Height | 1522 mm | 1571 mm | Renault +49 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2685 mm | 2785 mm | Renault +100 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Renault Megane E-Tech
Renault Scenic
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Renault Megane E-Tech
Renault Scenic
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Renault Megane E-Tech or Renault Scenic?
The Renault Scenic goes further: 642 km WLTP against the 500 km of the Renault Megane E-Tech. That is a difference of 142 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Renault Scenic takes more: 545 l against 440 l in the Renault Megane E-Tech. The difference is 105 l.
Which charges faster?
The Renault Megane E-Tech accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Renault Scenic up to 150 kW. Charging from 15 to 80% takes 24 and 28 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Renault Megane E-Tech uses less electricity: 15.7 kWh/100 km against 16.8 kWh/100 km in the Renault Scenic. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 165 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.