BMW iX2 vs Renault Megane E-Tech
Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW iX2 130 kW, Renault Megane E-Tech 165 kW · Boot — BMW iX2 525 l, Renault Megane E-Tech 440 l · 0–100 km/h — BMW iX2 8.6 s, Renault Megane E-Tech 7.6 s.
BMW iX2
The BMW iX2 is a crossover in the C segment that offers two all-electric variants, both boasting a WLTP range exceeding 470 kilometers.
Renault Megane E-Tech
An electric crossover in the C-segment, offering a range of up to 500 km and fast charging (DC).
Profile against the market: BMW iX2 vs Renault Megane E-Tech
BMW iX2eDrive20
Renault Megane E-TechComfort Range 67 kWh
BMW iX2 or Renault Megane E-Tech — who wins where
Renault Megane E-Tech leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBMW iX2 +16 km
- Battery kWhRenault Megane E-Tech +1.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX2 −1.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSRenault Megane E-Tech +14 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sRenault Megane E-Tech −1 s
- Top speed km/hBMW iX2 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWRenault Megane E-Tech +35 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Megane E-Tech −113 kg
- Boot lBMW iX2 +85 l
Technical data: BMW iX2 vs Renault Megane E-Tech
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW iX2 eDrive20 | Renault Megane E-Tech Comfort Range 67 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 516 km | 500 km | BMW +16 km |
| Battery | 65.2 kWh | 67 kWh | Renault +1.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.2 kWh/100 km | 15.7 kWh/100 km | BMW −1.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 130 kW | 165 kW | Renault +35 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 29 min 10–80% | 24 min 15–80% | 5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12.5 km/min | 13.5 km/min | Renault +1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 218 PS | Renault +14 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.6 s | 7.6 s | Renault −1 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 160 km/h | BMW +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1885 kg | 1772 kg | Renault −113 kg |
| Boot | 525 l | 440 l | BMW +85 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Renault |
| Length | 4554 mm | 4200 mm | BMW +354 mm |
| Width | 1845 mm | 1768 mm | BMW +77 mm |
| Height | 1560 mm | 1522 mm | BMW +38 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2692 mm | 2685 mm | BMW +7 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX2
Renault Megane E-Tech
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Renault Megane E-Tech
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BMW iX2 or Renault Megane E-Tech?
The BMW iX2 goes further: 516 km WLTP against the 500 km of the Renault Megane E-Tech. That is a difference of 16 km.
Why does the Renault Megane E-Tech have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the BMW iX2?
The Renault Megane E-Tech carries 67 kWh and covers 500 km, while the BMW iX2 with its 65.2 kWh battery does 516 km. Energy use decides it: 15.7 against 14.2 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Renault Megane E-Tech — its 67 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX2, with 65.2 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The BMW iX2 takes more: 525 l against 440 l in the Renault Megane E-Tech. The difference is 85 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.