Renault Megane E-Tech vs Škoda Elroq
Biggest differences: Power — Renault Megane E-Tech 218 PS, Škoda Elroq 286 PS · DC charging — Renault Megane E-Tech 165 kW, Škoda Elroq 135 kW · Weight — Renault Megane E-Tech 1772 kg, Škoda Elroq 2050 kg.
Renault Megane E-Tech
An electric crossover in the C-segment, offering a range of up to 500 km and fast charging (DC).
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Renault Megane E-Tech vs Škoda Elroq
Renault Megane E-TechComfort Range 67 kWh
Škoda Elroq85
Renault Megane E-Tech or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 7 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +73 km
- Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +10 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −1 s
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +20 km/h
- DC charging kWRenault Megane E-Tech +30 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Megane E-Tech −278 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Elroq +30 l
Technical data: Renault Megane E-Tech vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Renault Megane E-Tech Comfort Range 67 kWh | Škoda Elroq 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 500 km | 573 km | Škoda +73 km |
| Battery | 67 kWh | 77 kWh | Škoda +10 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.7 kWh/100 km | 15.2 kWh/100 km | Škoda −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 135 kW | Renault +30 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 24 min 15–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 13.5 km/min | 14.3 km/min | Škoda +0.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 286 PS | Škoda +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.6 s | 6.6 s | Škoda −1 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 180 km/h | Škoda +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1772 kg | 2050 kg | Renault −278 kg |
| Boot | 440 l | 470 l | Škoda +30 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Renault |
| Length | 4200 mm | 4488 mm | Škoda +288 mm |
| Width | 1768 mm | 1884 mm | Škoda +116 mm |
| Height | 1522 mm | 1625 mm | Škoda +103 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2685 mm | 2765 mm | Škoda +80 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Renault Megane E-Tech
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Renault Megane E-Tech
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Renault Megane E-Tech or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 500 km of the Renault Megane E-Tech. That is a difference of 73 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Renault Megane E-Tech and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The Renault Megane E-Tech has FWD and 218 PS. The Škoda Elroq has RWD and 286 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Renault Megane E-Tech — its 67 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Elroq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Renault Megane E-Tech accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 135 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.