Lancia Gamma vs Renault Megane E-Tech
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Biggest differences: AC charging — Lancia Gamma 7 kW, Renault Megane E-Tech 11 kW · WLTP range — Lancia Gamma 741 km, Renault Megane E-Tech 500 km · Battery — Lancia Gamma 97.2 kWh, Renault Megane E-Tech 67 kWh.
Lancia Gamma
The Lancia Gamma is an all-electric crossover in the C segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 543 to 741 km, power ranging from 230 to 350 horsepower, and DC fast charging at 160 kW.
Renault Megane E-Tech
An electric crossover in the C-segment, offering a range of up to 500 km and fast charging (DC).
Profile against the market: Lancia Gamma vs Renault Megane E-Tech
Lancia GammaLong Range
Renault Megane E-TechComfort Range 67 kWh
Lancia Gamma or Renault Megane E-Tech — who wins where
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLancia Gamma +241 km
- Battery kWhLancia Gamma +30.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmRenault Megane E-Tech −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLancia Gamma +27 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sRenault Megane E-Tech −0.2 s
- Top speed km/hLancia Gamma +30 km/h
- DC charging kWRenault Megane E-Tech +5 kW
- AC charging kWRenault Megane E-Tech +4 kW
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Megane E-Tech −363 kg
- Boot lLancia Gamma +120 l
Technical data: Lancia Gamma vs Renault Megane E-Tech
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Lancia Gamma Long Range | Renault Megane E-Tech Comfort Range 67 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 741 km | 500 km | Lancia +241 km |
| Battery | 97.2 kWh | 67 kWh | Lancia +30.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.2 kWh/100 km | 15.7 kWh/100 km | Renault −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 165 kW | Renault +5 kW |
| AC charging | 7 kW | 11 kW | Renault +4 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 24 min 15–80% | 3 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 16.5 km/min | 13.5 km/min | Lancia +3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 245 PS | 218 PS | Lancia +27 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.8 s | 7.6 s | Renault −0.2 s |
| Top speed | 190 km/h | 160 km/h | Lancia +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2135 kg | 1772 kg | Renault −363 kg |
| Boot | 560 l | 440 l | Lancia +120 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4672 mm | 4200 mm | Lancia +472 mm |
| Width | 1898 mm | 1768 mm | Lancia +130 mm |
| Height | 1664 mm | 1522 mm | Lancia +142 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2791 mm | 2685 mm | Lancia +106 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Lancia Gamma
Renault Megane E-Tech
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Lancia Gamma
Renault Megane E-Tech
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Lancia Gamma or Renault Megane E-Tech?
The Lancia Gamma goes further: 741 km WLTP against the 500 km of the Renault Megane E-Tech. That is a difference of 241 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Lancia Gamma takes more: 560 l against 440 l in the Renault Megane E-Tech. The difference is 120 l.
Which charges faster?
The Lancia Gamma accepts up to 160 kW DC, the Renault Megane E-Tech up to 165 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Renault Megane E-Tech uses less electricity: 15.7 kWh/100 km against 16.2 kWh/100 km in the Lancia Gamma. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 75 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.