Peugeot E-3008 vs SERES 3

Biggest differences: WLTP range — Peugeot E-3008 698 km, SERES 3 300 km · Boot — Peugeot E-3008 588 l, SERES 3 318 l · Battery — Peugeot E-3008 96.9 kWh, SERES 3 54 kWh.

Peugeot E-3008

The Peugeot E-3008 is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.

SERES 3

The electric SUV belongs to the C-segment and is equipped with front-wheel drive and a 54 kWh battery.

Profile against the market: Peugeot E-3008 vs SERES 3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Peugeot E-3008 or SERES 3 — who wins where

Peugeot E-3008 leads 7 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmPeugeot E-3008 +398 km
    Peugeot E-3008
    698
    SERES 3
    300
  • Battery kWhPeugeot E-3008 +42.9 kWh
    Peugeot E-3008
    96.9
    SERES 3
    54
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmPeugeot E-3008 −0.5 kWh/100 km
    Peugeot E-3008
    17.1
    SERES 3
    17.6
  • Power PSPeugeot E-3008 +71 PS
    Peugeot E-3008
    231
    SERES 3
    160
  • 0–100 km/h sPeugeot E-3008 −0.2 s
    Peugeot E-3008
    8.7
    SERES 3
    8.9
  • Top speed km/hPeugeot E-3008 +15 km/h
    Peugeot E-3008
    170
    SERES 3
    155
  • DC charging kWNo data
    Peugeot E-3008
    160
    SERES 3
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Peugeot E-3008
    11
    SERES 3
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    Peugeot E-3008
    27
    SERES 3
  • Weight kgSERES 3 −401 kg
    Peugeot E-3008
    2166
    SERES 3
    1765
  • Boot lPeugeot E-3008 +270 l
    Peugeot E-3008
    588
    SERES 3
    318

Add a third car

Technical data: Peugeot E-3008 vs SERES 3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Peugeot E-3008 vs SERES 3
Key parameters Peugeot E-3008
230 Long Range
SERES 3
Standard
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range698 km300 kmPeugeot +398 km
Battery96.9 kWh54 kWhPeugeot +42.9 kWh
Consumption17.1 kWh/100 km17.6 kWh/100 kmPeugeot −0.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging160 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 20–80%27 min
Range per minute of charging15.5 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power231 PS160 PSPeugeot +71 PS
0–100 km/h8.7 s8.9 sPeugeot −0.2 s
Top speed170 km/h155 km/hPeugeot +15 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight2166 kg1765 kgSERES −401 kg
Boot588 l318 lPeugeot +270 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Peugeot
Length4542 mm4415 mmPeugeot +127 mm
Width1895 mm1850 mmPeugeot +45 mm
Height1641 mm1650 mmSERES +9 mm
Wheelbase2739 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Peugeot E-3008

Cost per 100 km5.13
Monthly64
Yearly770

SERES 3

Cost per 100 km5.28
Monthly66
Yearly792

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Peugeot E-3008

SERES 3

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Peugeot E-3008 or SERES 3?

The Peugeot E-3008 goes further: 698 km WLTP against the 300 km of the SERES 3. That is a difference of 398 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Peugeot E-3008 — its 96.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The SERES 3, with 54 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Peugeot E-3008 or SERES 3?

The Peugeot E-3008 is stronger: 231 PS against the 160 PS of the SERES 3. The gap is 71 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Peugeot E-3008 takes more: 588 l against 318 l in the SERES 3. The difference is 270 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.