Nissan Leaf vs SERES 3

Biggest differences: WLTP range — Nissan Leaf 622 km, SERES 3 300 km · Battery — Nissan Leaf 75 kWh, SERES 3 54 kWh · Boot — Nissan Leaf 437 l, SERES 3 318 l.

Nissan Leaf

The Nissan Leaf is a crossover in the C segment with front-wheel drive, offering two battery options and a range of up to 622 kilometers (in the MY2026 model).

SERES 3

The electric SUV belongs to the C-segment and is equipped with front-wheel drive and a 54 kWh battery.

Profile against the market: Nissan Leaf vs SERES 3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Nissan Leaf or SERES 3 — who wins where

Nissan Leaf leads 7 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmNissan Leaf +322 km
    Nissan Leaf
    622
    SERES 3
    300
  • Battery kWhNissan Leaf +21 kWh
    Nissan Leaf
    75
    SERES 3
    54
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmNissan Leaf −3.8 kWh/100 km
    Nissan Leaf
    13.8
    SERES 3
    17.6
  • Power PSNissan Leaf +57 PS
    Nissan Leaf
    217
    SERES 3
    160
  • 0–100 km/h sNissan Leaf −1.3 s
    Nissan Leaf
    7.6
    SERES 3
    8.9
  • Top speed km/hNissan Leaf +5 km/h
    Nissan Leaf
    160
    SERES 3
    155
  • DC charging kWNo data
    Nissan Leaf
    150
    SERES 3
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Nissan Leaf
    11
    SERES 3
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    Nissan Leaf
    30
    SERES 3
  • Weight kgSERES 3 −118 kg
    Nissan Leaf
    1883
    SERES 3
    1765
  • Boot lNissan Leaf +119 l
    Nissan Leaf
    437
    SERES 3
    318

Add a third car

Technical data: Nissan Leaf vs SERES 3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Nissan Leaf vs SERES 3
Key parameters Nissan Leaf
75 kWh
SERES 3
Standard
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range622 km300 kmNissan +322 km
Battery75 kWh54 kWhNissan +21 kWh
Consumption13.8 kWh/100 km17.6 kWh/100 kmNissan −3.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 20–80%30 min
Range per minute of charging12.4 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power217 PS160 PSNissan +57 PS
0–100 km/h7.6 s8.9 sNissan −1.3 s
Top speed160 km/h155 km/hNissan +5 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1883 kg1765 kgSERES −118 kg
Boot437 l318 lNissan +119 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Nissan
Length4350 mm4415 mmSERES +65 mm
Width1810 mm1850 mmSERES +40 mm
Height1550 mm1650 mmSERES +100 mm
Wheelbase2690 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Nissan Leaf

Cost per 100 km4.14
Monthly52
Yearly621

SERES 3

Cost per 100 km5.28
Monthly66
Yearly792

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Nissan Leaf

SERES 3

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Nissan Leaf or SERES 3?

The Nissan Leaf goes further: 622 km WLTP against the 300 km of the SERES 3. That is a difference of 322 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Nissan Leaf — its 75 kWh battery then works as a power source. The SERES 3, with 54 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Nissan Leaf or SERES 3?

The Nissan Leaf is stronger: 217 PS against the 160 PS of the SERES 3. The gap is 57 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Nissan Leaf takes more: 437 l against 318 l in the SERES 3. The difference is 119 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.