Nio ET7 vs Xpeng P7+
Biggest differences: DC charging — Nio ET7 125 kW, Xpeng P7+ 446 kW · Charging 10–80% — Nio ET7 40 min, Xpeng P7+ 12 min · Power — Nio ET7 653 PS, Xpeng P7+ 313 PS.
Nio ET7
The NIO ET7 is an electric sedan from the E-segment, equipped with AWD and a power output of 653 horsepower, offering a WLTP range of 580 kilometers.
Xpeng P7+
An electric sedan in the E-segment, offering three drive variants with WLTP ranges of up to 530 km and fast charging (DC).
Profile against the market: Nio ET7 vs Xpeng P7+
Nio ET7 or Xpeng P7+ — who wins where
Xpeng P7+ leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmNio ET7 +50 km
- Battery kWhNio ET7 +25.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmXpeng P7+ −2.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNio ET7 +340 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNio ET7 −2.4 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWXpeng P7+ +321 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minXpeng P7+ −28 min
- Weight ↓ kgXpeng P7+ −279 kg
- Boot lXpeng P7+ +210 l
Technical data: Nio ET7 vs Xpeng P7+
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Nio ET7100 kWh |  Xpeng P7+Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 580 km | 530 km | Nio +50 km |
| Battery | 100 kWh | 74.9 kWh | Nio +25.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19 kWh/100 km | 16.4 kWh/100 km | Xpeng −2.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 125 kW | 446 kW | Xpeng +321 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 40 min | 12 min | Xpeng −28 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 10.2 km/min | 30.9 km/min | Xpeng +20.7 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Xpeng +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 653 PS | 313 PS | Nio +340 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 3.8 s | 6.2 s | Nio −2.4 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 200 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2379 kg | 2100 kg | Xpeng −279 kg |
| Boot | 363 l | 573 l | Xpeng +210 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Xpeng |
| Length | 5101 mm | 5071 mm | Nio +30 mm |
| Width | 1987 mm | 1937 mm | Nio +50 mm |
| Height | 1505 mm | 1512 mm | Xpeng +7 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3060 mm | 3000 mm | Nio +60 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Nio ET7
Xpeng P7+
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Nio ET7 or Xpeng P7+?
The Nio ET7 goes further: 580 km WLTP against the 530 km of the Xpeng P7+. That is a difference of 50 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Nio ET7 and the Xpeng P7+ differ?
The Nio ET7 has AWD and 653 PS. The Xpeng P7+ has RWD and 313 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Xpeng P7+ — its 74.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Nio ET7, with 100 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Nio ET7 or Xpeng P7+?
The Nio ET7 is stronger: 653 PS against the 313 PS of the Xpeng P7+. The gap is 340 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.