Nio ET7 vs Porsche Taycan
Porsche Taycan leads 7 to 3
Biggest differences: DC charging — Nio ET7 125 kW, Porsche Taycan 320 kW · Charging 10–80% — Nio ET7 40 min, Porsche Taycan 18 min · Power — Nio ET7 653 PS, Porsche Taycan 435 PS.
Nio ET7
The NIO ET7 is an electric sedan from the E-segment, equipped with AWD and a power output of 653 horsepower, offering a WLTP range of 580 kilometers.
Porsche Taycan
The Porsche Taycan is an E-segment sedan: for model year 2027 in 11 versions, WLTP range from 555 to 700 km, power from 408 to 789 hp and DC charging up to 320 kW.
Profile against the market: Nio ET7 vs Porsche Taycan
Nio ET7100 kWh- Porsche TaycanPerformance Battery Plus · 2027 model year
Nio ET7 or Porsche Taycan — who wins where
Porsche Taycan leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPorsche Taycan +120 km
- Battery kWhNio ET7 +3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPorsche Taycan −2.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNio ET7 +218 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNio ET7 −1 s
- Top speed km/hPorsche Taycan +30 km/h
- DC charging kWPorsche Taycan +195 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minPorsche Taycan −22 min
- Weight ↓ kgPorsche Taycan −209 kg
- Boot lPorsche Taycan +44 l
Technical data: Nio ET7 vs Porsche Taycan
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Nio ET7 100 kWh | Porsche Taycan Performance Battery Plus · 2027 model year | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 580 km | 700 km | Porsche +120 km |
| Battery | 100 kWh | 97 kWh | Nio +3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19 kWh/100 km | 16.4 kWh/100 km | Porsche −2.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 125 kW | 320 kW | Porsche +195 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 40 min | 18 min | Porsche −22 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 10.2 km/min | 27.2 km/min | Porsche +17 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Porsche +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 653 PS | 435 PS | Nio +218 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 3.8 s | 4.8 s | Nio −1 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 230 km/h | Porsche +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2379 kg | 2170 kg | Porsche −209 kg |
| Boot | 363 l | 407 l | Porsche +44 l |
| Length | 5101 mm | 4963 mm | Nio +138 mm |
| Width | 1987 mm | 1966 mm | Nio +21 mm |
| Height | 1505 mm | 1379 mm | Nio +126 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3060 mm | 2900 mm | Nio +160 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Nio ET7
Porsche Taycan
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Porsche Taycan
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Nio ET7 or Porsche Taycan?
The Porsche Taycan goes further: 700 km WLTP against the 580 km of the Nio ET7. That is a difference of 120 km.
Why does the Nio ET7 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Porsche Taycan?
The Nio ET7 carries 100 kWh and covers 580 km, while the Porsche Taycan with its 97 kWh battery does 700 km. Energy use decides it: 19 against 16.4 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Nio ET7 and the Porsche Taycan differ?
The Nio ET7 has AWD and 653 PS. The Porsche Taycan has RWD and 435 PS.
Which is more powerful — Nio ET7 or Porsche Taycan?
The Nio ET7 is stronger: 653 PS against the 435 PS of the Porsche Taycan. The gap is 218 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.