Genesis G80 Electrified vs Nio ET7
Nio ET7 leads 6 to 4
Biggest differences: Power — Genesis G80 Electrified 370 PS, Nio ET7 653 PS · Charging 10–80% — Genesis G80 Electrified 25 min, Nio ET7 40 min · DC charging — Genesis G80 Electrified 187 kW, Nio ET7 125 kW.
Genesis G80 Electrified
The Genesis G80 Electrified is an E-segment sedan: in model year 2026 it has a 94.5 kWh battery, a WLTP range of 570 km and 370 hp with AWD.
Nio ET7
The NIO ET7 is an electric sedan from the E-segment, equipped with AWD and a power output of 653 horsepower, offering a WLTP range of 580 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Genesis G80 Electrified vs Nio ET7
Genesis G80 ElectrifiedAWD 94.5 kWh
Nio ET7100 kWh
Genesis G80 Electrified or Nio ET7 — who wins where
Nio ET7 leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmNio ET7 +10 km
- Battery kWhNio ET7 +5.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmGenesis G80 Electrified −0.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNio ET7 +283 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNio ET7 −1.3 s
- Top speed km/hGenesis G80 Electrified +25 km/h
- DC charging kWGenesis G80 Electrified +62 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minGenesis G80 Electrified −15 min
- Weight ↓ kgNio ET7 −31 kg
- Boot lNio ET7 +29 l
Technical data: Genesis G80 Electrified vs Nio ET7
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Genesis G80 Electrified AWD 94.5 kWh | Nio ET7 100 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 570 km | 580 km | Nio +10 km |
| Battery | 94.5 kWh | 100 kWh | Nio +5.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.1 kWh/100 km | 19 kWh/100 km | Genesis −0.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 187 kW | 125 kW | Genesis +62 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 25 min | 40 min | Genesis −15 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 16 km/min | 10.2 km/min | Genesis +5.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Genesis +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 370 PS | 653 PS | Nio +283 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 5.1 s | 3.8 s | Nio −1.3 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h | 200 km/h | Genesis +25 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2410 kg | 2379 kg | Nio −31 kg |
| Boot | 334 l | 363 l | Nio +29 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Genesis |
| Length | 5135 mm | 5101 mm | Genesis +34 mm |
| Width | — | 1987 mm | — |
| Height | 1480 mm | 1505 mm | Nio +25 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3140 mm | 3060 mm | Genesis +80 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Genesis G80 Electrified
Nio ET7
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Genesis G80 Electrified
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Genesis G80 Electrified — its 94.5 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Nio ET7, with 100 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Genesis G80 Electrified or Nio ET7?
The Nio ET7 is stronger: 653 PS against the 370 PS of the Genesis G80 Electrified. The gap is 283 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Genesis G80 Electrified accepts up to 187 kW DC, the Nio ET7 up to 125 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 25 and 40 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Genesis G80 Electrified uses less electricity: 18.1 kWh/100 km against 19 kWh/100 km in the Nio ET7. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 135 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.