Lexus ES vs Nio ET7

Biggest differences: Power — Lexus ES 224 PS, Nio ET7 653 PS · 0–100 km/h — Lexus ES 8 s, Nio ET7 3.8 s · AC charging — Lexus ES 22 kW, Nio ET7 11 kW.

Lexus ES

The Lexus ES is a sedan in the E segment that offers two drivetrain options: front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive, with power ranging from 224 to 343 horsepower.

Nio ET7

The NIO ET7 is an electric sedan from the E-segment, equipped with AWD and a power output of 653 horsepower, offering a WLTP range of 580 kilometers.

Profile against the market: Lexus ES vs Nio ET7

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Lexus ES or Nio ET7 — who wins where

Lexus ES leads 7 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLexus ES +1 km
    Lexus ES
    581
    Nio ET7
    580
  • Battery kWhNio ET7 +28 kWh
    Lexus ES
    72
    Nio ET7
    100
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmLexus ES −2.8 kWh/100 km
    Lexus ES
    16.2
    Nio ET7
    19
  • Power PSNio ET7 +429 PS
    Lexus ES
    224
    Nio ET7
    653
  • 0–100 km/h sNio ET7 −4.2 s
    Lexus ES
    8
    Nio ET7
    3.8
  • Top speed km/hNio ET7 +40 km/h
    Lexus ES
    160
    Nio ET7
    200
  • DC charging kWLexus ES +25 kW
    Lexus ES
    150
    Nio ET7
    125
  • AC charging kWLexus ES +11 kW
    Lexus ES
    22
    Nio ET7
    11
  • Charging minLexus ES −10 min
    Lexus ES
    30
    Nio ET7
    40
  • Weight kgLexus ES −274 kg
    Lexus ES
    2105
    Nio ET7
    2379
  • Boot lLexus ES +154 l
    Lexus ES
    517
    Nio ET7
    363

Add a third car

Technical data: Lexus ES vs Nio ET7

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Lexus ES vs Nio ET7
Key parameters Lexus ES
350e
Nio ET7
100 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range581 km580 kmLexus +1 km
Battery72 kWh100 kWhNio +28 kWh
Consumption16.2 kWh/100 km19 kWh/100 kmLexus −2.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW125 kWLexus +25 kW
AC charging22 kW11 kWLexus +11 kW
Charging 10–80%30 min40 minLexus −10 min
Range per minute of charging13.6 km/min10.2 km/minLexus +3.4 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power224 PS653 PSNio +429 PS
0–100 km/h8 s3.8 sNio −4.2 s
Top speed160 km/h200 km/hNio +40 km/h
DrivetrainFWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2105 kg2379 kgLexus −274 kg
Boot517 l363 lLexus +154 l
Length5140 mm5101 mmLexus +39 mm
Width1920 mm1987 mmNio +67 mm
Height1555 mm1505 mmLexus +50 mm
Wheelbase2950 mm3060 mmNio +110 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Lexus ES

Cost per 100 km4.86
Monthly61
Yearly729

Nio ET7

Cost per 100 km5.7
Monthly71
Yearly855

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Lexus ES

Nio ET7

Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Why does the Nio ET7 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Lexus ES?

The Nio ET7 carries 100 kWh and covers 580 km, while the Lexus ES with its 72 kWh battery does 581 km. Energy use decides it: 19 against 16.2 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Lexus ES and the Nio ET7 differ?

The Lexus ES has FWD and 224 PS. The Nio ET7 has AWD and 653 PS.

Which is more powerful — Lexus ES or Nio ET7?

The Nio ET7 is stronger: 653 PS against the 224 PS of the Lexus ES. The gap is 429 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Lexus ES takes more: 517 l against 363 l in the Nio ET7. The difference is 154 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.