Exlantix ES vs Nio ET7
Biggest differences: DC charging — Exlantix ES 250 kW, Nio ET7 125 kW · Power — Exlantix ES 480 PS, Nio ET7 653 PS · Boot — Exlantix ES 450 l, Nio ET7 363 l.
Exlantix ES
The Exlantix ES is an electric sedan in the E-segment, featuring all-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 600 kilometers.
Nio ET7
The NIO ET7 is an electric sedan from the E-segment, equipped with AWD and a power output of 653 horsepower, offering a WLTP range of 580 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Exlantix ES vs Nio ET7
- Exlantix ESLong Range AWD
Nio ET7100 kWh
Exlantix ES or Nio ET7 — who wins where
Exlantix ES leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmExlantix ES +20 km
- Battery kWhNio ET7 +18 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmExlantix ES −3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNio ET7 +173 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNio ET7 −0.7 s
- Top speed km/hExlantix ES +10 km/h
- DC charging kWExlantix ES +125 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgExlantix ES −329 kg
- Boot lExlantix ES +87 l
Technical data: Exlantix ES vs Nio ET7
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Exlantix ES Long Range AWD | Nio ET7 100 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 600 km | 580 km | Exlantix +20 km |
| Battery | 82 kWh | 100 kWh | Nio +18 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16 kWh/100 km | 19 kWh/100 km | Exlantix −3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 250 kW | 125 kW | Exlantix +125 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 15 min 30–80% | 40 min 10–80% | 25 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 20 km/min | 10.2 km/min | Exlantix +9.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Exlantix +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 480 PS | 653 PS | Nio +173 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.5 s | 3.8 s | Nio −0.7 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 200 km/h | Exlantix +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2050 kg | 2379 kg | Exlantix −329 kg |
| Boot | 450 l | 363 l | Exlantix +87 l |
| Length | 4945 mm | 5101 mm | Nio +156 mm |
| Width | 1920 mm | 1987 mm | Nio +67 mm |
| Height | 1500 mm | 1505 mm | Nio +5 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2950 mm | 3060 mm | Nio +110 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Exlantix ES
Nio ET7
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Other comparisons in this class: Sedan, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Exlantix ES or Nio ET7?
The Exlantix ES goes further: 600 km WLTP against the 580 km of the Nio ET7. That is a difference of 20 km.
Why does the Nio ET7 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Exlantix ES?
The Nio ET7 carries 100 kWh and covers 580 km, while the Exlantix ES with its 82 kWh battery does 600 km. Energy use decides it: 19 against 16 kWh/100 km.
Which is more powerful — Exlantix ES or Nio ET7?
The Nio ET7 is stronger: 653 PS against the 480 PS of the Exlantix ES. The gap is 173 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Exlantix ES takes more: 450 l against 363 l in the Nio ET7. The difference is 87 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.