Lucid Gravity vs Range Rover Electric

Lucid Gravity leads 7 to 0

Biggest differences: Power — Lucid Gravity 839 PS, Range Rover Electric 550 PS · Top speed — Lucid Gravity 250 km/h, Range Rover Electric 200 km/h · 0–100 km/h — Lucid Gravity 3.6 s, Range Rover Electric 4.5 s.

Lucid Gravity

The Lucid Gravity is an SUV in the F-segment, offering two AWD (All-Wheel Drive) variants with high power and a range of up to 748 km in the Grand Touring version.

Range Rover Electric

An all-electric SUV in the F segment, offering a range of 611 km and two power options with the same battery capacity.

Profile against the market: Lucid Gravity vs Range Rover Electric

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Lucid Gravity or Range Rover Electric — who wins where

Lucid Gravity leads 7 to 0

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLucid Gravity +137 km
    Lucid Gravity
    748
    Range Rover Electric
    611
  • Battery kWhLucid Gravity +4.5 kWh
    Lucid Gravity
    123
    Range Rover Electric
    118.5
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLucid Gravity −3.7 kWh/100 km
    Lucid Gravity
    18.2
    Range Rover Electric
    21.9
  • Power PSLucid Gravity +289 PS
    Lucid Gravity
    839
    Range Rover Electric
    550
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sLucid Gravity −0.9 s
    Lucid Gravity
    3.6
    Range Rover Electric
    4.5
  • Top speed km/hLucid Gravity +50 km/h
    Lucid Gravity
    250
    Range Rover Electric
    200
  • DC charging kWNo data
    Lucid Gravity
    400
    Range Rover Electric
    —
  • AC charging kWNo data
    Lucid Gravity
    11
    Range Rover Electric
    —
  • Charging ↓ minNo data
    Lucid Gravity
    —
    Range Rover Electric
    22
  • Weight ↓ kgNo data
    Lucid Gravity
    2650
    Range Rover Electric
    —
  • Boot lLucid Gravity +47 l
    Lucid Gravity
    780
    Range Rover Electric
    733

Add a third car

Technical data: Lucid Gravity vs Range Rover Electric

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Lucid Gravity vs Range Rover Electric
Key parameters Lucid Gravity
Grand Touring
Range Rover Electric
EV550
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range748 km611 kmLucid +137 km
Battery123 kWh118.5 kWhLucid +4.5 kWh
Consumption ↓18.2 kWh/100 km21.9 kWh/100 kmLucid −3.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging400 kW——
AC charging11 kW——
Charging 10–80% ↓—22 min—
Range per minute of charging—19.4 km/min—
Voltage800 V800 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power839 PS550 PSLucid +289 PS
0–100 km/h ↓3.6 s4.5 sLucid −0.9 s
Top speed250 km/h200 km/hLucid +50 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2650 kg——
Boot780 l733 lLucid +47 l
Length5034 mm5052 mmRange Rover +18 mm
Width2024 mm——
Height1660 mm1868 mmRange Rover +208 mm
Wheelbase3035 mm2997 mmLucid +38 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Lucid Gravity

Cost per 100 km5.46
Monthly68
Yearly819

Range Rover Electric

Cost per 100 km6.57
Monthly82
Yearly985

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Lucid Gravity

Range Rover Electric

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment F

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Lucid Gravity or Range Rover Electric?

The Lucid Gravity goes further: 748 km WLTP against the 611 km of the Range Rover Electric. That is a difference of 137 km.

Which is more powerful — Lucid Gravity or Range Rover Electric?

The Lucid Gravity is stronger: 839 PS against the 550 PS of the Range Rover Electric. The gap is 289 PS.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Lucid Gravity uses less electricity: 18.2 kWh/100 km against 21.9 kWh/100 km in the Range Rover Electric. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 555 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.