Mercedes EQS SUV vs Range Rover Electric
Range Rover Electric leads 5 to 3
Biggest differences: Power — Mercedes EQS SUV 360 PS, Range Rover Electric 550 PS · Charging 10–80% — Mercedes EQS SUV 31 min, Range Rover Electric 22 min · 0–100 km/h — Mercedes EQS SUV 5.8 s, Range Rover Electric 4.5 s.
Mercedes EQS SUV
The Mercedes EQS SUV is an electric vehicle in the F segment, offering all-wheel drive and ranges exceeding 600 km according to the WLTP standard in most configurations.
Range Rover Electric
An all-electric SUV in the F segment, offering a range of 611 km and two power options with the same battery capacity.
Profile against the market: Mercedes EQS SUV vs Range Rover Electric
Mercedes EQS SUV450 4MATIC- Range Rover ElectricEV550
Mercedes EQS SUV or Range Rover Electric — who wins where
Range Rover Electric leads 5 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes EQS SUV +2 km
- Battery kWhRange Rover Electric +10.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes EQS SUV −2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSRange Rover Electric +190 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sRange Rover Electric −1.3 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes EQS SUV +10 km/h
- DC charging kWNo data
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minRange Rover Electric −9 min
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lRange Rover Electric +88 l
Technical data: Mercedes EQS SUV vs Range Rover Electric
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mercedes EQS SUV 450 4MATIC | Range Rover Electric EV550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 613 km | 611 km | Mercedes +2 km |
| Battery | 108 kWh | 118.5 kWh | Range Rover +10.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 19.9 kWh/100 km | 21.9 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 200 kW | — | — |
| AC charging | 11 kW | — | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 31 min | 22 min | Range Rover −9 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 13.8 km/min | 19.4 km/min | Range Rover +5.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Range Rover +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 360 PS | 550 PS | Range Rover +190 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 5.8 s | 4.5 s | Range Rover −1.3 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 200 km/h | Mercedes +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2735 kg | — | — |
| Boot | 645 l | 733 l | Range Rover +88 l |
| Length | 5125 mm | 5052 mm | Mercedes +73 mm |
| Width | 1959 mm | — | — |
| Height | 1718 mm | 1868 mm | Range Rover +150 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3210 mm | 2997 mm | Mercedes +213 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mercedes EQS SUV
Range Rover Electric
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes EQS SUV
Range Rover Electric
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment F
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Range Rover Electric have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Mercedes EQS SUV?
The Range Rover Electric carries 118.5 kWh and covers 611 km, while the Mercedes EQS SUV with its 108 kWh battery does 613 km. Energy use decides it: 21.9 against 19.9 kWh/100 km.
Which is more powerful — Mercedes EQS SUV or Range Rover Electric?
The Range Rover Electric is stronger: 550 PS against the 360 PS of the Mercedes EQS SUV. The gap is 190 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Range Rover Electric takes more: 733 l against 645 l in the Mercedes EQS SUV. The difference is 88 l.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Mercedes EQS SUV uses less electricity: 19.9 kWh/100 km against 21.9 kWh/100 km in the Range Rover Electric. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 300 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.