Lotus Eletre vs Range Rover Electric

Lotus Eletre leads 4 to 3

Biggest differences: Top speed — Lotus Eletre 258 km/h, Range Rover Electric 200 km/h · Power — Lotus Eletre 612 PS, Range Rover Electric 550 PS · Charging 10–80% — Lotus Eletre 20 min, Range Rover Electric 22 min.

Lotus Eletre

An electric SUV in the F-segment, combining high power with fast DC charging and a large cargo capacity.

Range Rover Electric

An all-electric SUV in the F segment, offering a range of 611 km and two power options with the same battery capacity.

Profile against the market: Lotus Eletre vs Range Rover Electric

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Lotus Eletre or Range Rover Electric — who wins where

Lotus Eletre leads 4 to 3

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmRange Rover Electric +11 km
    Lotus Eletre
    600
    Range Rover Electric
    611
  • Battery kWhRange Rover Electric +6.5 kWh
    Lotus Eletre
    112
    Range Rover Electric
    118.5
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLotus Eletre −0.5 kWh/100 km
    Lotus Eletre
    21.4
    Range Rover Electric
    21.9
  • Power PSLotus Eletre +62 PS
    Lotus Eletre
    612
    Range Rover Electric
    550
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo difference
    Lotus Eletre
    4.5
    Range Rover Electric
    4.5
  • Top speed km/hLotus Eletre +58 km/h
    Lotus Eletre
    258
    Range Rover Electric
    200
  • DC charging kWNo data
    Lotus Eletre
    350
    Range Rover Electric
    —
  • AC charging kWNo data
    Lotus Eletre
    22
    Range Rover Electric
    —
  • Charging ↓ minLotus Eletre −2 min
    Lotus Eletre
    20
    Range Rover Electric
    22
  • Weight ↓ kgNo data
    Lotus Eletre
    2595
    Range Rover Electric
    —
  • Boot lRange Rover Electric +45 l
    Lotus Eletre
    688
    Range Rover Electric
    733

Add a third car

Technical data: Lotus Eletre vs Range Rover Electric

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Lotus Eletre vs Range Rover Electric
Key parameters Lotus Eletre
Base
Range Rover Electric
EV550
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range600 km611 kmRange Rover +11 km
Battery112 kWh118.5 kWhRange Rover +6.5 kWh
Consumption ↓21.4 kWh/100 km21.9 kWh/100 kmLotus −0.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging350 kW——
AC charging22 kW——
Charging 10–80% ↓20 min22 minLotus −2 min
Range per minute of charging21 km/min19.4 km/minLotus +1.6 km/min
Voltage800 V800 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power612 PS550 PSLotus +62 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.5 s4.5 sNo difference
Top speed258 km/h200 km/hLotus +58 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2595 kg——
Boot688 l733 lRange Rover +45 l
Length5103 mm5052 mmLotus +51 mm
Width2019 mm——
Height1630 mm1868 mmRange Rover +238 mm
Wheelbase3019 mm2997 mmLotus +22 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Lotus Eletre

Cost per 100 km6.42
Monthly80
Yearly963

Range Rover Electric

Cost per 100 km6.57
Monthly82
Yearly985

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Lotus Eletre

Range Rover Electric

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment F

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which is cheaper to run?

The Lotus Eletre uses less electricity: 21.4 kWh/100 km against 21.9 kWh/100 km in the Range Rover Electric. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 75 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.