Lotus Eletre vs Tesla Model X

Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Lotus Eletre 4.5 s, Tesla Model X 2.6 s · Power — Lotus Eletre 612 PS, Tesla Model X 1020 PS · Boot — Lotus Eletre 688 l, Tesla Model X 1050 l.

Lotus Eletre

An electric SUV in the F-segment, combining high power with fast DC charging and a large cargo capacity.

Tesla Model X

The electric SUV in segment F offers two high-performance drive options with a range exceeding 570 km in the WLTP cycle.

Profile against the market: Lotus Eletre vs Tesla Model X

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Lotus Eletre or Tesla Model X — who wins where

Tesla Model X leads 7 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmTesla Model X +9 km
    Lotus Eletre
    600
    Tesla Model X
    609
  • Battery kWhNo data
    Lotus Eletre
    112
    Tesla Model X
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmTesla Model X −2.1 kWh/100 km
    Lotus Eletre
    21.4
    Tesla Model X
    19.3
  • Power PSTesla Model X +408 PS
    Lotus Eletre
    612
    Tesla Model X
    1020
  • 0–100 km/h sTesla Model X −1.9 s
    Lotus Eletre
    4.5
    Tesla Model X
    2.6
  • Top speed km/hTesla Model X +4 km/h
    Lotus Eletre
    258
    Tesla Model X
    262
  • DC charging kWLotus Eletre +100 kW
    Lotus Eletre
    350
    Tesla Model X
    250
  • AC charging kWNo data
    Lotus Eletre
    22
    Tesla Model X
  • Charging minNo data
    Lotus Eletre
    20
    Tesla Model X
  • Weight kgTesla Model X −125 kg
    Lotus Eletre
    2595
    Tesla Model X
    2470
  • Boot lTesla Model X +362 l
    Lotus Eletre
    688
    Tesla Model X
    1050

Add a third car

Technical data: Lotus Eletre vs Tesla Model X

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Lotus Eletre vs Tesla Model X
Key parameters Lotus Eletre
Base
Tesla Model X
Plaid
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range600 km609 kmTesla +9 km
Battery112 kWh
Consumption21.4 kWh/100 km19.3 kWh/100 kmTesla −2.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging350 kW250 kWLotus +100 kW
AC charging22 kW
Charging 10–80%20 min
Range per minute of charging21 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VLotus +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power612 PS1020 PSTesla +408 PS
0–100 km/h4.5 s2.6 sTesla −1.9 s
Top speed258 km/h262 km/hTesla +4 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2595 kg2470 kgTesla −125 kg
Boot688 l1050 lTesla +362 l
Length5103 mm5057 mmLotus +46 mm
Width2019 mm1999 mmLotus +20 mm
Height1630 mm1680 mmTesla +50 mm
Wheelbase3019 mm2965 mmLotus +54 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Lotus Eletre

Cost per 100 km6.42
Monthly80
Yearly963

Tesla Model X

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Lotus Eletre

Tesla Model X

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment F

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which is more powerful — Lotus Eletre or Tesla Model X?

The Tesla Model X is stronger: 1020 PS against the 612 PS of the Lotus Eletre. The gap is 408 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Tesla Model X takes more: 1050 l against 688 l in the Lotus Eletre. The difference is 362 l.

Which charges faster?

The Lotus Eletre accepts up to 350 kW DC, the Tesla Model X up to 250 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Tesla Model X uses less electricity: 19.3 kWh/100 km against 21.4 kWh/100 km in the Lotus Eletre. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 315 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.