Bentley Torcal vs Tesla Model X

Tesla Model X leads 6 to 1

Biggest differences: Boot — Bentley Torcal 460 l, Tesla Model X 1050 l · Power — Bentley Torcal 888 PS, Tesla Model X 1020 PS · 0–100 km/h — Bentley Torcal 2.9 s, Tesla Model X 2.6 s.

Bentley Torcal

The Bentley Torcal is the first all-electric SUV from Bentley: it features a 108.7 kWh battery, a range of up to 603 km according to the WLTP standard, and a power output of 821 or 888 horsepower.

Tesla Model X

The electric SUV in segment F offers two high-performance drive options with a range exceeding 570 km in the WLTP cycle.

Profile against the market: Bentley Torcal vs Tesla Model X

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Bentley Torcal or Tesla Model X — who wins where

Tesla Model X leads 6 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmTesla Model X +6 km
    Bentley Torcal
    603
    Tesla Model X
    609
  • Battery kWhNo data
    Bentley Torcal
    108.7
    Tesla Model X
    —
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBentley Torcal −1.3 kWh/100 km
    Bentley Torcal
    18
    Tesla Model X
    19.3
  • Power PSTesla Model X +132 PS
    Bentley Torcal
    888
    Tesla Model X
    1020
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sTesla Model X −0.3 s
    Bentley Torcal
    2.9
    Tesla Model X
    2.6
  • Top speed km/hTesla Model X +2 km/h
    Bentley Torcal
    260
    Tesla Model X
    262
  • DC charging kWNo data
    Bentley Torcal
    —
    Tesla Model X
    250
  • AC charging kWNo data
    Bentley Torcal
    —
    Tesla Model X
    —
  • Charging ↓ minNo data
    Bentley Torcal
    16
    Tesla Model X
    —
  • Weight ↓ kgTesla Model X −250 kg
    Bentley Torcal
    2720
    Tesla Model X
    2470
  • Boot lTesla Model X +590 l
    Bentley Torcal
    460
    Tesla Model X
    1050

Add a third car

Technical data: Bentley Torcal vs Tesla Model X

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Bentley Torcal vs Tesla Model X
Key parameters Bentley Torcal
S
Tesla Model X
Plaid
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range603 km609 kmTesla +6 km
Battery108.7 kWh——
Consumption ↓18 kWh/100 km19.3 kWh/100 kmBentley −1.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging—250 kW—
AC charging———
Charging 10–80% ↓16 min——
Range per minute of charging26.4 km/min——
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power888 PS1020 PSTesla +132 PS
0–100 km/h ↓2.9 s2.6 sTesla −0.3 s
Top speed260 km/h262 km/hTesla +2 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2720 kg2470 kgTesla −250 kg
Boot460 l1050 lTesla +590 l
Length5008 mm5057 mmTesla +49 mm
Width2025 mm1999 mmBentley +26 mm
Height1677 mm1680 mmTesla +3 mm
Wheelbase3023 mm2965 mmBentley +58 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Bentley Torcal

Cost per 100 km5.4
Monthly67
Yearly810

Tesla Model X

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Bentley Torcal

Tesla Model X

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment F

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the bigger boot?

The Tesla Model X takes more: 1050 l against 460 l in the Bentley Torcal. The difference is 590 l.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Bentley Torcal uses less electricity: 18 kWh/100 km against 19.3 kWh/100 km in the Tesla Model X. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 195 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.