Lucid Gravity vs Mercedes EQS SUV
Biggest differences: Power — Lucid Gravity 839 PS, Mercedes EQS SUV 360 PS · DC charging — Lucid Gravity 400 kW, Mercedes EQS SUV 200 kW · 0–100 km/h — Lucid Gravity 3.6 s, Mercedes EQS SUV 5.8 s.
Lucid Gravity
The Lucid Gravity is an SUV in the F-segment, offering two AWD (All-Wheel Drive) variants with high power and a range of up to 748 km in the Grand Touring version.
Mercedes EQS SUV
The Mercedes EQS SUV is an electric vehicle in the F segment, offering all-wheel drive and ranges exceeding 600 km according to the WLTP standard in most configurations.
Profile against the market: Lucid Gravity vs Mercedes EQS SUV
- Lucid GravityGrand Touring
Mercedes EQS SUV450 4MATIC
Lucid Gravity or Mercedes EQS SUV — who wins where
Lucid Gravity leads 9 to 0
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLucid Gravity +135 km
- Battery kWhLucid Gravity +15 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLucid Gravity −1.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLucid Gravity +479 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sLucid Gravity −2.2 s
- Top speed km/hLucid Gravity +40 km/h
- DC charging kWLucid Gravity +200 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgLucid Gravity −85 kg
- Boot lLucid Gravity +135 l
Technical data: Lucid Gravity vs Mercedes EQS SUV
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Lucid Gravity Grand Touring | Mercedes EQS SUV 450 4MATIC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 748 km | 613 km | Lucid +135 km |
| Battery | 123 kWh | 108 kWh | Lucid +15 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.2 kWh/100 km | 19.9 kWh/100 km | Lucid −1.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 400 kW | 200 kW | Lucid +200 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 31 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 13.8 km/min | — |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Lucid +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 839 PS | 360 PS | Lucid +479 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 3.6 s | 5.8 s | Lucid −2.2 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h | 210 km/h | Lucid +40 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2650 kg | 2735 kg | Lucid −85 kg |
| Boot | 780 l | 645 l | Lucid +135 l |
| Length | 5034 mm | 5125 mm | Mercedes +91 mm |
| Width | 2024 mm | 1959 mm | Lucid +65 mm |
| Height | 1660 mm | 1718 mm | Mercedes +58 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3035 mm | 3210 mm | Mercedes +175 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Lucid Gravity
Mercedes EQS SUV
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Lucid Gravity
Mercedes EQS SUV
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment F
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Lucid Gravity or Mercedes EQS SUV?
The Lucid Gravity goes further: 748 km WLTP against the 613 km of the Mercedes EQS SUV. That is a difference of 135 km.
Which is more powerful — Lucid Gravity or Mercedes EQS SUV?
The Lucid Gravity is stronger: 839 PS against the 360 PS of the Mercedes EQS SUV. The gap is 479 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Lucid Gravity takes more: 780 l against 645 l in the Mercedes EQS SUV. The difference is 135 l.
Which charges faster?
The Lucid Gravity accepts up to 400 kW DC, the Mercedes EQS SUV up to 200 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.