Lucid Gravity vs Tesla Model X
Biggest differences: DC charging — Lucid Gravity 400 kW, Tesla Model X 250 kW · 0–100 km/h — Lucid Gravity 3.6 s, Tesla Model X 2.6 s · Boot — Lucid Gravity 780 l, Tesla Model X 1050 l.
Lucid Gravity
The Lucid Gravity is an SUV in the F-segment, offering two AWD (All-Wheel Drive) variants with high power and a range of up to 748 km in the Grand Touring version.
Tesla Model X
The electric SUV in segment F offers two high-performance drive options with a range exceeding 570 km in the WLTP cycle.
Profile against the market: Lucid Gravity vs Tesla Model X
- Lucid GravityGrand Touring
Tesla Model XPlaid
Lucid Gravity or Tesla Model X — who wins where
Tesla Model X leads 5 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLucid Gravity +139 km
- Battery kWhNo data
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLucid Gravity −1.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSTesla Model X +181 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sTesla Model X −1 s
- Top speed km/hTesla Model X +12 km/h
- DC charging kWLucid Gravity +150 kW
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgTesla Model X −180 kg
- Boot lTesla Model X +270 l
Technical data: Lucid Gravity vs Tesla Model X
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Lucid Gravity Grand Touring | Tesla Model X Plaid | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 748 km | 609 km | Lucid +139 km |
| Battery | 123 kWh | — | — |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.2 kWh/100 km | 19.3 kWh/100 km | Lucid −1.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 400 kW | 250 kW | Lucid +150 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | — | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | — | — |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Lucid +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 839 PS | 1020 PS | Tesla +181 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 3.6 s | 2.6 s | Tesla −1 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h | 262 km/h | Tesla +12 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2650 kg | 2470 kg | Tesla −180 kg |
| Boot | 780 l | 1050 l | Tesla +270 l |
| Length | 5034 mm | 5057 mm | Tesla +23 mm |
| Width | 2024 mm | 1999 mm | Lucid +25 mm |
| Height | 1660 mm | 1680 mm | Tesla +20 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3035 mm | 2965 mm | Lucid +70 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Lucid Gravity
Tesla Model X
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Lucid Gravity
Tesla Model X
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment F
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Lucid Gravity or Tesla Model X?
The Lucid Gravity goes further: 748 km WLTP against the 609 km of the Tesla Model X. That is a difference of 139 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Tesla Model X takes more: 1050 l against 780 l in the Lucid Gravity. The difference is 270 l.
Which charges faster?
The Lucid Gravity accepts up to 400 kW DC, the Tesla Model X up to 250 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Lucid Gravity uses less electricity: 18.2 kWh/100 km against 19.3 kWh/100 km in the Tesla Model X. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 165 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.