Bentley Torcal vs Lucid Gravity
It's a tie: 4 to 4
Biggest differences: Boot — Bentley Torcal 460 l, Lucid Gravity 780 l · 0–100 km/h — Bentley Torcal 2.9 s, Lucid Gravity 3.6 s · WLTP range — Bentley Torcal 603 km, Lucid Gravity 748 km.
Bentley Torcal
The Bentley Torcal is the first all-electric SUV from Bentley: it features a 108.7 kWh battery, a range of up to 603 km according to the WLTP standard, and a power output of 821 or 888 horsepower.
Lucid Gravity
The Lucid Gravity is an SUV in the F-segment, offering two AWD (All-Wheel Drive) variants with high power and a range of up to 748 km in the Grand Touring version.
Profile against the market: Bentley Torcal vs Lucid Gravity
- Bentley TorcalS
- Lucid GravityGrand Touring
Bentley Torcal or Lucid Gravity — who wins where
It's a tie: 4 to 4
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLucid Gravity +145 km
- Battery kWhLucid Gravity +14.3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBentley Torcal −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBentley Torcal +49 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBentley Torcal −0.7 s
- Top speed km/hBentley Torcal +10 km/h
- DC charging kWNo data
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgLucid Gravity −70 kg
- Boot lLucid Gravity +320 l
Technical data: Bentley Torcal vs Lucid Gravity
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Bentley Torcal S | Lucid Gravity Grand Touring | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 603 km | 748 km | Lucid +145 km |
| Battery | 108.7 kWh | 123 kWh | Lucid +14.3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18 kWh/100 km | 18.2 kWh/100 km | Bentley −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | — | 400 kW | — |
| AC charging | — | 11 kW | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 16 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 26.4 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | — | 800 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 888 PS | 839 PS | Bentley +49 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 2.9 s | 3.6 s | Bentley −0.7 s |
| Top speed | 260 km/h | 250 km/h | Bentley +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2720 kg | 2650 kg | Lucid −70 kg |
| Boot | 460 l | 780 l | Lucid +320 l |
| Length | 5008 mm | 5034 mm | Lucid +26 mm |
| Width | 2025 mm | 2024 mm | Bentley +1 mm |
| Height | 1677 mm | 1660 mm | Bentley +17 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3023 mm | 3035 mm | Lucid +12 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Bentley Torcal
Lucid Gravity
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Bentley Torcal
Lucid Gravity
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment F
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Bentley Torcal or Lucid Gravity?
The Lucid Gravity goes further: 748 km WLTP against the 603 km of the Bentley Torcal. That is a difference of 145 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Lucid Gravity takes more: 780 l against 460 l in the Bentley Torcal. The difference is 320 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.