Changan Deepal S05 vs Toyota C-HR+
Biggest differences: WLTP range — Changan Deepal S05 488 km, Toyota C-HR+ 606 km · Charging 10–80% — Changan Deepal S05 23 min, Toyota C-HR+ 28 min · Power — Changan Deepal S05 272 PS, Toyota C-HR+ 224 PS.
Changan Deepal S05
The Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV offering two powertrain options, with power ranging from 272 horsepower to 435 horsepower.
Toyota C-HR+
The Toyota C-HR+ is a crossover in the C segment that offers three different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges, with a top speed of up to 180 km/h.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S05 vs Toyota C-HR+
- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
Toyota C-HR+77 kWh
Changan Deepal S05 or Toyota C-HR+ — who wins where
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmToyota C-HR+ +118 km
- Battery kWhToyota C-HR+ +3.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmToyota C-HR+ −2.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSChangan Deepal S05 +48 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sToyota C-HR+ −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hChangan Deepal S05 +20 km/h
- DC charging kWChangan Deepal S05 +18 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minChangan Deepal S05 −5 min
- Weight ↓ kgToyota C-HR+ −50 kg
- Boot lChangan Deepal S05 +76 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S05 vs Toyota C-HR+
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 488 km | 606 km | Toyota +118 km |
| Battery | 68.8 kWh | 72 kWh | Toyota +3.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 13.4 kWh/100 km | Toyota −2.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 168 kW | 150 kW | Changan +18 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 23 min | 28 min | Changan −5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.9 km/min | 15.2 km/min | Toyota +0.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 224 PS | Changan +48 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.5 s | 7.4 s | Toyota −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | Changan +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1940 kg | 1890 kg | Toyota −50 kg |
| Boot | 492 l | 416 l | Changan +76 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4598 mm | 4520 mm | Changan +78 mm |
| Width | 1900 mm | 1870 mm | Changan +30 mm |
| Height | 1600 mm | 1595 mm | Changan +5 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm | 2750 mm | Changan +130 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S05
Toyota C-HR+
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S05
Toyota C-HR+
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S05 or Toyota C-HR+?
The Toyota C-HR+ goes further: 606 km WLTP against the 488 km of the Changan Deepal S05. That is a difference of 118 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Changan Deepal S05 and the Toyota C-HR+ differ?
The Changan Deepal S05 has RWD and 272 PS. The Toyota C-HR+ has FWD and 224 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Changan Deepal S05 takes more: 492 l against 416 l in the Toyota C-HR+. The difference is 76 l.
Which charges faster?
The Changan Deepal S05 accepts up to 168 kW DC, the Toyota C-HR+ up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 23 and 28 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.