Changan Deepal S05 vs Kia Niro EV
Biggest differences: DC charging — Changan Deepal S05 168 kW, Kia Niro EV 80 kW · Charging 10–80% — Changan Deepal S05 23 min, Kia Niro EV 43 min · Power — Changan Deepal S05 272 PS, Kia Niro EV 204 PS.
Changan Deepal S05
The Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV offering two powertrain options, with power ranging from 272 horsepower to 435 horsepower.
Kia Niro EV
The Kia Niro EV is an electric crossover in the C-segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 460 km according to the WLTP cycle.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S05 vs Kia Niro EV
- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
Kia Niro EV64.8 kWh
Changan Deepal S05 or Kia Niro EV — who wins where
Changan Deepal S05 leads 9 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmChangan Deepal S05 +28 km
- Battery kWhChangan Deepal S05 +4 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmChangan Deepal S05 −0.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSChangan Deepal S05 +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sChangan Deepal S05 −0.3 s
- Top speed km/hChangan Deepal S05 +13 km/h
- DC charging kWChangan Deepal S05 +88 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minChangan Deepal S05 −20 min
- Weight ↓ kgKia Niro EV −330 kg
- Boot lChangan Deepal S05 +17 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S05 vs Kia Niro EV
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Kia Niro EV 64.8 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 488 km | 460 km | Changan +28 km |
| Battery | 68.8 kWh | 64.8 kWh | Changan +4 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | Changan −0.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 168 kW | 80 kW | Changan +88 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 23 min | 43 min | Changan −20 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.9 km/min | 7.5 km/min | Changan +7.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 204 PS | Changan +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.5 s | 7.8 s | Changan −0.3 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 167 km/h | Changan +13 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1940 kg | 1610 kg | Kia −330 kg |
| Boot | 492 l | 475 l | Changan +17 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4598 mm | 4420 mm | Changan +178 mm |
| Width | 1900 mm | 1825 mm | Changan +75 mm |
| Height | 1600 mm | 1570 mm | Changan +30 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm | 2720 mm | Changan +160 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S05
Kia Niro EV
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S05
Kia Niro EV
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S05 or Kia Niro EV?
The Changan Deepal S05 goes further: 488 km WLTP against the 460 km of the Kia Niro EV. That is a difference of 28 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Changan Deepal S05 and the Kia Niro EV differ?
The Changan Deepal S05 has RWD and 272 PS. The Kia Niro EV has FWD and 204 PS.
Which is more powerful — Changan Deepal S05 or Kia Niro EV?
The Changan Deepal S05 is stronger: 272 PS against the 204 PS of the Kia Niro EV. The gap is 68 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Changan Deepal S05 accepts up to 168 kW DC, the Kia Niro EV up to 80 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 23 and 43 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.