Changan Deepal S05 vs Jeep Compass
Biggest differences: Battery — Changan Deepal S05 68.8 kWh, Jeep Compass 96.3 kWh · WLTP range — Changan Deepal S05 488 km, Jeep Compass 674 km · Power — Changan Deepal S05 272 PS, Jeep Compass 231 PS.
Changan Deepal S05
The Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV offering two powertrain options, with power ranging from 272 horsepower to 435 horsepower.
Jeep Compass
The Jeep Compass is an SUV in the C segment, available with three different powertrain options and battery capacities, offering a range of up to 674 kilometers according to the WLTP cycle.
Profile against the market: Changan Deepal S05 vs Jeep Compass
- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
Jeep CompassLong Range FWD (96,3 kWh)
Changan Deepal S05 or Jeep Compass — who wins where
Changan Deepal S05 leads 5 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmJeep Compass +186 km
- Battery kWhJeep Compass +27.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmChangan Deepal S05 −1.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSChangan Deepal S05 +41 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sChangan Deepal S05 −0.8 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWChangan Deepal S05 +8 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgChangan Deepal S05 −220 kg
- Boot lJeep Compass +58 l
Technical data: Changan Deepal S05 vs Jeep Compass
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Jeep Compass Long Range FWD (96,3 kWh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 488 km | 674 km | Jeep +186 km |
| Battery | 68.8 kWh | 96.3 kWh | Jeep +27.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 17.8 kWh/100 km | Changan −1.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 168 kW | 160 kW | Changan +8 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 23 min 10–80% | 27 min 20–80% | 4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.9 km/min | 15 km/min | Jeep +0.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 231 PS | Changan +41 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.5 s | 8.3 s | Changan −0.8 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1940 kg | 2160 kg | Changan −220 kg |
| Boot | 492 l | 550 l | Jeep +58 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Changan |
| Length | 4598 mm | 4548 mm | Changan +50 mm |
| Width | 1900 mm | 1936 mm | Jeep +36 mm |
| Height | 1600 mm | 1657 mm | Jeep +57 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2880 mm | 2795 mm | Changan +85 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Changan Deepal S05
Jeep Compass
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S05
Jeep Compass
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Changan Deepal S05 or Jeep Compass?
The Jeep Compass goes further: 674 km WLTP against the 488 km of the Changan Deepal S05. That is a difference of 186 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Changan Deepal S05 and the Jeep Compass differ?
The Changan Deepal S05 has RWD and 272 PS. The Jeep Compass has FWD and 231 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S05 — its 68.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Jeep Compass, with 96.3 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Jeep Compass takes more: 550 l against 492 l in the Changan Deepal S05. The difference is 58 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.