BMW iX1 vs Changan Deepal S05
Biggest differences: Power — BMW iX1 204 PS, Changan Deepal S05 272 PS · DC charging — BMW iX1 130 kW, Changan Deepal S05 168 kW · Charging 10–80% — BMW iX1 29 min, Changan Deepal S05 23 min.
BMW iX1
The BMW iX1 is a compact electric SUV that offers two power options and can be configured with either front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive.
Changan Deepal S05
The Changan Deepal S05 is a C-segment SUV offering two powertrain options, with power ranging from 272 horsepower to 435 horsepower.
Profile against the market: BMW iX1 vs Changan Deepal S05
BMW iX1eDrive20- Changan Deepal S05RWD Max
BMW iX1 or Changan Deepal S05 — who wins where
Changan Deepal S05 leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmChangan Deepal S05 +13 km
- Battery kWhChangan Deepal S05 +4.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX1 −0.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSChangan Deepal S05 +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sChangan Deepal S05 −1.1 s
- Top speed km/hChangan Deepal S05 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWChangan Deepal S05 +38 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minChangan Deepal S05 −6 min
- Weight ↓ kgBMW iX1 −75 kg
- Boot lChangan Deepal S05 +2 l
Technical data: BMW iX1 vs Changan Deepal S05
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW iX1 eDrive20 | Changan Deepal S05 RWD Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 475 km | 488 km | Changan +13 km |
| Battery | 64.7 kWh | 68.8 kWh | Changan +4.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.4 kWh/100 km | 15.9 kWh/100 km | BMW −0.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 130 kW | 168 kW | Changan +38 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 29 min | 23 min | Changan −6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 11.5 km/min | 14.9 km/min | Changan +3.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 272 PS | Changan +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.6 s | 7.5 s | Changan −1.1 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | Changan +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1865 kg | 1940 kg | BMW −75 kg |
| Boot | 490 l | 492 l | Changan +2 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Changan |
| Length | 4500 mm | 4598 mm | Changan +98 mm |
| Width | 1845 mm | 1900 mm | Changan +55 mm |
| Height | 1616 mm | 1600 mm | BMW +16 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2692 mm | 2880 mm | Changan +188 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX1
Changan Deepal S05
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Changan Deepal S05
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BMW iX1 or Changan Deepal S05?
The Changan Deepal S05 goes further: 488 km WLTP against the 475 km of the BMW iX1. That is a difference of 13 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX1 and the Changan Deepal S05 differ?
The BMW iX1 has FWD and 204 PS. The Changan Deepal S05 has RWD and 272 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Changan Deepal S05 — its 68.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX1, with 64.7 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — BMW iX1 or Changan Deepal S05?
The Changan Deepal S05 is stronger: 272 PS against the 204 PS of the BMW iX1. The gap is 68 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.