Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Toyota C-HR+
Biggest differences: Boot — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 535 l, Toyota C-HR+ 416 l · Power — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 286 PS, Toyota C-HR+ 224 PS · DC charging — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron 175 kW, Toyota C-HR+ 150 kW.
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering four different drive variants with varying power outputs and ranges.
Toyota C-HR+
The Toyota C-HR+ is a crossover in the C segment that offers three different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges, with a top speed of up to 180 km/h.
Profile against the market: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Toyota C-HR+
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Toyota C-HR+ — who wins where
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmToyota C-HR+ +33 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmToyota C-HR+ −2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +62 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron −0.7 s
- Top speed km/hAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +20 km/h
- DC charging kWAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +25 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgToyota C-HR+ −180 kg
- Boot lAudi Q4 Sportback e-tron +119 l
Technical data: Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron vs Toyota C-HR+
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron45 |  Toyota C-HR+77 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 573 km | 606 km | Toyota +33 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 72 kWh | Audi +5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.4 kWh/100 km | 13.4 kWh/100 km | Toyota −2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 175 kW | 150 kW | Audi +25 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 28 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 15.2 km/min | Toyota +0.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 224 PS | Audi +62 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.7 s | 7.4 s | Audi −0.7 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | Audi +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2070 kg | 1890 kg | Toyota −180 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 416 l | Audi +119 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Toyota |
| Length | 4588 mm | 4520 mm | Audi +68 mm |
| Width | 1865 mm | 1870 mm | Toyota +5 mm |
| Height | 1614 mm | 1595 mm | Audi +19 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2764 mm | 2750 mm | Audi +14 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Toyota C-HR+
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron
Toyota C-HR+
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron or Toyota C-HR+?
The Toyota C-HR+ goes further: 606 km WLTP against the 573 km of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron. That is a difference of 33 km.
Why does the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Toyota C-HR+?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron carries 77 kWh and covers 573 km, while the Toyota C-HR+ with its 72 kWh battery does 606 km. Energy use decides it: 15.4 against 13.4 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron and the Toyota C-HR+ differ?
The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron has RWD and 286 PS. The Toyota C-HR+ has FWD and 224 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Toyota C-HR+ — its 72 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.